Church group takes mission trip to Lewiston, ME to give love to Somalis

It used to be that if you wanted to take a Christian mission trip to help impoverished Africans you went to Africa.  But, heck why spend the money on airfare when you can do the same thing right here—in Lewiston, ME.   Here is an article about an Exeter, NH church group that hopped a bus and drove a few hours to nearby Maine to help poor and many presumably unemployed Somalis and other homeless people there.   

You may have heard about Lewiston, Maine.  It became famous for its Somali population a few years ago when the story was that Somalis living in the Atlanta area got sick of being harrassed by local blacks and sent their elders city shopping.   They picked Lewiston, Maine—a very unhappy town at the time (and maybe still is).  

According to this article there are 7000 Somalis living in Lewiston now, with more arriving daily—7000!

So the church group spread around a lot of Christian love even though some among them were set back a bit by the behavior of the Somali kids.  But, it’s o.k. because it’s all post-traumatic stress that makes these kids behave so badly.

It was during this playtime with the Somali kids that we saw frequent flashes of what post-traumatic stress has done to these children.  [Ed:  These Somalis have been in Lewiston a long time and I'm betting many of these kids were born here]   The boys, in particular, are extremely aggressive and do not have any ability to talk out a conflict. They immediately resort to fighting and they fight hard.

Another factor that exacerbates the bad behavior of these children is that the Somali parents in Lewiston allow their children to just wander about town unsupervised and, as a result, are never there to witness the questionable behavior. The Somali parents think of Lewiston as their village rather than as an urban city. The director of the Jubilee Center, Kim Wettlaufer, has initiated dialogue (via interpreters) between the local police and the Somali parents so the police can try to explain why it is not safe for them to let their children wander unsupervised.

Despite the fighting and bad language, our kids recognized that these children needed and wanted the same things that every child wants: to feel safe, to have friends, and to be loved. In the afternoon, we created a safe and organized place for the kids to do crafts. Our kids gave these children endless piggyback rides, played hopscotch, blew bubbles, played soccer and basketball and just hung out and talked. When bad language was used, our kids would gently and consistently let them know that such language was unacceptable. Our kids were important role models for these children for the whole week and it rubbed off on them.

Yup, and after a week the church folks went home.

Four employees of the International Rescue Committee killed in Afghanistan

Update with more detail:   The Washington Post published this more detailed account of what happened here.

The International Rescue Committee has released the names of its four staff members who were tragically killed in an ambush Wednesday morning in Logar Province Afghanistan.

It doesn’t matter to Islamic fighters whether westerners are good people doing charitable work.  I suspect the women in this group were targets because they symbolize freedom for women—something the Taliban and Al-Queda fear the most.

The victims were en route to Kabul and traveling in a clearly marked International Rescue Committee vehicle when they came under fire at mid-morning.

The IRC has suspended operations in Afghanistan indefinitely according to this report.

Spencer tells us why the Tyson’s Labor Day incident was not a little thing

Yesterday, noted Islamic expert, Robert Spencer, reported to readers at Jihad Watch why the Tyson’s incident was an important event and we ignore it at our peril.    This is how he wraps up the post, but please read the whole thing here:

The idea that non-Muslims must be inconvenienced in order to accommodate Muslims is precisely the problem. And the fact is that there is an organized effort to build on such accommodations in order to create a privileged status for Muslims and Islam in the U.S. The Brotherhood memorandum speaks of the Islamization of the U.S. as happening slowly and incrementally. Obviously they don’t announce their overall goal with each initiative, but the Brotherhood has turned out to be behind many of these incidents — notably the refusal of cab drivers at the Minneapolis airport to carry passengers with alcohol, and the charter school that was teaching Islam while receiving public funds. In light of its involvement with such incidents, can they really be viewed as isolated? Can the Brotherhood’s own stated overall goals safely be discounted as having nothing to do with these initiatives? Is it not possible that their goal of Islamization might be being pursued incrementally, in small steps?

I don’t think that possibility can safely be discounted, and that’s why I am wary of the Tyson incident and other initiatives aimed at accommodating Islamic practices. Each may be in itself utterly innocuous — but that Brotherhood plan is real, and I believe we ignore it at our own risk.

Remember: Islam means “submission.” That’s what it’s all about.

 

Just in at Jihad Watch: Somali found dead in Denver!

Update August 16:  See the latest news here, what role is Omar Jamal playing in this story?

Update:  The Somali was just crazy, not a terrorist so it’s all o.k., more at Jihad Watch.

A Canadian Somali immigrant found dead in a hotel room in Denver with enough cyanide to kill hundreds.  Read the story at Jihad Watch here.    What could be going on in Denver this month?  Hum, let me think.

Note to new readers—to learn more about Somalis in the US, just type the word “Somalis” into our search function.   Also, there are now over 80,000 Somalis legally in the US thanks to the State Department’s Refugee Resettlement program.    Tens of thousands have been admitted since 911.

Lawyers lament: Hispanic Gay Asylum seekers having a harder time staying in US

A couple of days ago the Washington Post published a lengthy feature article about how it is becoming increasingly difficult for gays and lesbians from Latin countries to seek asylum in the US.   The reason seems to revolve around increasing tolerance for homosexuality in countries south of the border.

Asylees are immigrants who get to the US under their own steam (as opposed to refugees who we fly here at taxpayer expense), and claim they are persecuted for one of many reasons in their birth country.   There are special lawyers in the US who then help them stay permanently.  Asylees are helped just like refugees with all sorts of special government forms of welfare.  I am assuming the taxpayer helps with the medical expenses of those with HIV.

… as Mexico and other Latin American countries begin to liberalize laws regarding homosexuality, hold gay pride events and expand treatment for people with AIDS, it is becoming increasingly difficult to win such cases, say asylum applicants, U.S. lawyers and Latino activists.

“For a time, it seemed like it was a slam-dunk if you were gay, from Mexico and filed for asylum in the United States,” said Arthur S. Leonard, a professor at New York Law School. “But there’s been a turning point. The gay rights movement has started to make progress in Mexico, and it’s a little harder to show” that asylum is warranted, he said.

The subtle, unofficial shift in immigration policy has significant public health implications, say leaders throughout the region who view asylum as a path to better treatment of people with HIV. Though many applaud the progress on gay rights and AIDS care, they caution that it may take decades to reverse deeply ingrained attitudes toward homosexuality that are closely connected to the spread of HIV in the region.

I’m wondering how the government and these asylum lawyers know if the immigrant claiming asylum is telling the truth.   Couldn’t an illegal immigrant coming across the border just say he is gay? Surely no one checks behind closed doors.

For more on this issue and the loosening of immigration laws to allow  HIV positive immigrants into the US see this earlier post.

Rohingya an environmental hazard in Bangladesh?

This article is a real head-scratcher.   It is published in something called the New Nation and is entitled “Using the media to communicate environmental risk.”   First its interesting to note that there are environmental activists in Bangladesh.  Maybe my view of that country is skewed but I envision it as a nation of poor people just struggling to survive.  Usually concern for the environment is considered a luxury in the third world and is a sign of increasing affluence.

But, here is a long paragraph from this opinion piece which ends with a curious comment.  After listing all the forms of environmental pollution the writer includes Rohingya Muslim refugees in the list.

Environmental risks, more or less, are now touching every sphere of our life. At a quick glance, more glaringly manifested environmental risks that could be easily identified in our country are: water pollution, misuse of agro-chemicals, unhygienic human habits, lack of sanitation facilities, effect of Farakka Barrage, recurring cyclones and floods, silting of river beds, large scale deforestation, etc. Moreover, there are other areas where environment hazards are present in different degrees. Those areas are: effect of shrimp cultivation, increase of salinity in the coastal belt, water logging in different areas, effects of wrongly built embankments, afforestation with exotic varieties instead of local variant of trees, downward trend of underground water level, threat of mangrove forest, industrial waste disposal in rivers, unhygienic situation in tanneries, noise pollution, presence of arsenic in underground water, growth of unplanned bus stations in the urban areas, emission of smoke from mechanised vehicles, brick-fields, mills and factories; presence of large number of unhealthy derelict ponds, continued presence of Rohingya refugees in our land, etc.

So, after dirty factories and ponds we have Rohingya?   Huh?  Then no further mention of how Rohingya are polluting Bangladesh.  One can only assume that the illegal immigrants, in this case the Rohingya, help degrade the environment.   Makes me wonder how big US environmental groups like the Sierra Club are incapable of noticing the same thing here.  See my post this morning on population increases in the US due to immigrants.

We have a whole category on Rohingya Muslims here.  This is one of the first posts I did on Rohingya.   They are actually from a region in Burma and are spreading out in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Pakistan.   Rohingya are also being resettled in the West, New Zealand and Australia.   They want to come to the US too and may already be here.

Immigration is responsible for shrinking US white population

By 2042, white Americans will be a minority according to new census figures.  Hat tip:  Dick.  Read what MSNBC says here:

WASHINGTON – White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That’s eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004.

Immigrants with high birth rates are responsible.  This is a good time to visit our link and watch (or rewatch) the Numbers USA video on this topic.