What is doing the right thing in Somalia?
Posted by Ann Corcoran on January 7, 2009
I’m still trying to avoid saying much about the situation in Somalia itself (it is beyond my pay grade), except as it relates to refugees who have either come to the US, or have recently returned to Africa, leaving their good life in the US behind to attend terrorist training in Somalia. But, just now this article by some supposed expert on Islam, Frankie Martin, appeared in my alerts and I couldn’t resist responding. Writing at the Huffington Post, his opinion piece (Doing the right thing in Somalia) is basically one more instruction for Obama and gang from those who elected him.
So, given the dire situation, what is to be done? Despite its mistakes in the region, the United States is best suited to bring Somalia’s factions together in a lasting peace.
So, Martin says the US is to blame for the Somali mess. But, I can think of a half dozen other countries that have some responsibility and are more suited to step between the warring Islamic factions.
This time the US should go in not with drones but diplomacy. President-elect Barack Obama will face a dizzying array of challenges when he takes office, but he must not let Somalia once again be neglected.
Personally I’m opting for continued neglect!
Obama — who is very popular among Somalis — or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should go to Somalia immediately after the inauguration to give muscle and credibility to the peace process. This would open a new chapter in US/Somali relations and signal that the US was serious about engaging with Somalia in a sustained and intelligent way.
What the h… is a sustained and intelligent way? I bet Martin doesn’t know either! And, don’t you just love it, the same liberals who said it was wrong for Bush to butt in in Iraq, now want us to butt in in Africa.
The US and its Western allies should work with moderate Muslims and extend dialogue invitations to those who disagree with its policy in the region. It should fund health and education programs [yes, of course, add Somalia to the list of taxpayer bailouts] and make it clear to the Somali people that the US is not at war with them or their Islamic faith. This would both attack piracy at its root by restoring stability and help to swing the pendulum away from radicals toward the tolerant Sufi Islam native to Somalia.
Does Martin think there isn’t the remotest possibility that the Islamic faith might be in a war with the US?
Here is where I agree with Martin. As a mother of an American soldier, I think we should send Obama or Hillary (or both!) to Somalia and keep our soldiers at home.
I’ll have more to say on Frankie later because I just learned he got involved in the Grand Island Swift Somali firing, but right now I have some other things to do. Come back later tomorrow! Update: Here it is.
4 Responses to “What is doing the right thing in Somalia?”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Beware we are coming! Al Shabab spells out its plan for worldwide caliphate « Refugee Resettlement Watch said
[...] born citizen of the United States?Fort Lauderdale demonstrators: Nuke Israel and Jews need ovensWhat is doing the right thing in Somalia?Old article sheds more light on Hispanic/Somali culture clash in meatpacking plantsAboutHow did we [...]
Old article sheds more light on Hispanic/Somali culture clash in meatpacking plants « Refugee Resettlement Watch said
[...] What is doing the right thing in Somalia? [...]
acorcoran said
Here is a lovely article about how the US is “gang raping Somalia” and suggesting the Obama Administration will do the same thing. Just more evidence to bolster my view that we should let Somalia take care of itself (one way or another). From a blog called Black Agenda Report:
The clock is ticking on George Bush’s government, but Washington’s threat to Somalia will outlast Bush. Susan Rice, Bill Clinton’s former assistant secretary of state for Africa, will soon become Barack Obama’s United Nations Ambassador and de facto point person on Africa. Susan Rice is just as warlike as Condoleezza Rice when it comes to Somalia. While Condoleezza Rice and her bosses justify U.S. aggressions in the name of spreading “democracy,” Susan Rice urges American military interventions in Somalia and Sudan and elsewhere on “humanitarian” grounds.
For Somalia, an Obama presidency represents the “same old same old” – the same bombs, the same bullets, the same catastrophes, the same imperialism, with a slightly different vocabulary.
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=965&Itemid=1
goneshiny said
I agree that whatever we do in Somalia should be well thought out. But surely there’s a difference between the ‘engaging’ (whatever it might be, ‘butting in’ as you termed it) proposed by Martin and invading as occurred in Iraq. The liberals never said don’t do anything in Iraq.
http://www.gonzogeek.com