You could take a story like this one and just change the location and names and place it in at least 20 newspapers in America. Once again, the same tired old story. Iraqis who had helped our military come to the US with high expectations (someone is lying to them somewhere along the way), they can’t find work and then the refugee resettlement industry folks say ‘too bad’ our hands are tied.
The story begins with the terrible circumstances that brought the adult Hassan family to America (the reporters always start out with the tragedy). Then we hear how they have arrived in America only to find they have no work and the government and their resettlement agency will be soon cutting them off, implying they could be set out on the street in just a few months.
They moved. [to America]
Now the family is desperate, said Ali Hasan, 30, one of five adult children who arrived in Everett with their mother this year.
“We can’t find jobs,” he said. “We’ve looked everywhere.”
Hasan was an English teacher in Baghdad. His brother and sisters also speak English. They thought they’d have an easier time than most who come to the U.S., but the global economic crisis has pushed them out of the hiring pool at places that once hired refugees.
Jobs cleaning buildings, stocking grocery store shelves and working in factory lines have either disappeared or been snatched up by local people who have been laid off.
The Hasan family must find work by October. That’s when their refugee cash assistance, just $359 per month per single adult, runs out. Families with children can apply for help through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, but single adults don’t have any other options.
“My heart goes out to them, but we’re tied by federal laws,” said Tom Medina, director of Washington state’s refugee resettlement program. “This economy is so tight that they’re competing with mainstream Americans for jobs.”
The economy has been tight for some time now, yet the US State Department and the volags (government contractors) are making no move to turn the spigot off or warn the refugees. Curious isn’t it. And, by the way, there is no law that says these agencies can’t find PRIVATE money to help the refugees beyond that magic date when they tell refugees they will be on the street.
Refugees are flooding into Washington State from everywhere.
The Hasans came to the U.S. as part of a federal program to resettle 12,000 Iraqis whose lives are at risk as long as they stay in the Middle East. It’s not clear how many Iraqi refugees will be resettled in Washington, but the state may be a prime destination because a large Iraqi community already exists here. Hundreds of Iraqis live in northeast Everett, many of whom came to the U.S. about 15 years ago after they protested against Saddam Hussein following Operation Desert Storm.
Nearly 100 Iraqis have arrived in Washington since the 2009 fiscal year began in October, Medina said. The state is likely to receive about 100 more before the end of the year. About 220 Iraqis arrived in 2008, he said.
The state is also receiving refugees from Bhutan, Burma, Ukraine, east Africa and other regions.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) says, it’s not our fault that the refugees expectations are too high.
“Some have expectations that are pretty high,” said Bob Johnson, director of the International Rescue Committee’s Seattle office.
And, it’s not our fault, those pesky people who volunteer their time to help refugees are discouraging them from taking jobs like cleaning pet cages:
Local churches and other groups often volunteer to help “sponsor” refugees, offering furniture and other supplies and help getting accustomed to everyday life. Sponsors can complicate a job search if they think a refugee is entitled to a better job than is available.
The well-intentioned volunteer doesn’t know the agency doesn’t get paid, or doesn’t get a good rating, if they don’t get that refugee employed at something—-anything!—-as fast as possible.
I have an idea! Since we just learned that the Leftwing big moneybags at the Tides Foundation (George Soros et al) gave the IRC $3.5 million a year ago, why not go to them again and ask for more money FOR REFUGEES, not for staff or offices or lobbying for Amnesty. I know for a fact that Soros was pushing for the Iraqis to come here because, among other projects, he sits on the ‘International Crisis Group’ board that advocated for Iraqi resettlement. Also, another Soros pet project, the Center for American Progress says they want to airlift 100,000 Iraqis here this year. Well how about you rich hypocrits pay for them! You have more money then the US government has at this point.
Endnote: I wrote about potential problems with Iraqi refugees in Everett back in 2007, here. At that time, Washington State was the 4th largest refugee-receiving state in the nation, I didn’t check if that is still the case.
Comment worth noting: maybe agencies have different pots of money
Posted by Ann Corcoran on June 6, 2009
This is a comment from ‘Iamevolved’ to the post I did yesterday about the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI)* lobbying on the Amnesty issue. I really wanted to know how giving 12 million illegal aliens amnesty would help refugees. Needless to say, no one answered that and I won’t hold my breath. But, ‘Iamevolved’ said this (below) which sent me off to do research (till my eyes were falling out of my head, but more on what I learned in upcoming posts.)
It is possible that volags have different pots of money they use to fund positions so that employees are able to conduct different forms of advocacy for the people who they serve. I fail to see how it takes away jobs from refugees. Help me understand how you see that.
I went to the most recent Form 990 that USCRI filed with the IRS. It covers the tax year Oct. 1, 2007 to Sept. 30th 2008. Total income for the year was $23,138,072. Of that amount $22,136,680 comes from you, the taxpayer. 96% of their entire income is from the government yet as a non-profit group they are unaccountable to you who pay for this.
So our commenter must be on to something, different pots of money? Only $1,001,392 comes from “direct public support” and they spent $1,000,000 lobbying. Humm! Now the question is, who funded the lobbying? Is it Soros money too? Certainly not the taxpayer, I think that is illegal. I don’t know who gave that $1 million to USCRI. Later I will tell you who did give a cool $3.5 million to the International Rescue Committee.
CEO Lavinia Limon had a salary and benefits package worth $198,466 in the tax year I looked at. And, then, keeping it in the family? Peter Limon, Director of Field Operations, took in $105,026 from you the taxpayer. What is that expression, doing well by doing good?
In the meantime, USCRI came under scrutiny in several of its affiliate offices. I’ve told you about this before here, but it bears repeating.
We have reported problems USCRI has had with other subcontractors in Albany, NY, Erie, PA, Waterbury, CT, Manchester, NH and Akron, OH. These were problems related to those subcontractors either having too many refugees and some not adequately caring for them, or in the case of Erie there was some funny-money business going on.
So here is what I was thinking: How about if USCRI uses its $1 million lobbying pot of money each year to help refugees it resettles—to keep them in better housing, feed them, clothe them, help them find jobs, and help the struggling affiliate staffs who are overloaded.
As for the jobs portion of ‘Iamevolved’s’ comment, I answered that at the post.
* USCRI is one of the top ten federal contractors resettling refugees but is by no means the largest.
Share this:
Like this:
Posted in Comments worth noting, Reforms needed, Refugee Resettlement Program | 5 Comments »