A Muslim campaign against honor killings
Posted by judyw on July 24, 2008
We’ve posted a number of times about honor killings by Muslims in the United States. See here, here, and here for example, or enter “honor” in our search function. It is one of the disgusting practices brought here by Muslims from some countries, like female genital mutilation.
Today FrontPage Magazine interviews a woman named Linda Ahmed, a Swede who married a Muslim man and converted. She converted only to Islam, however, not to radical Islamism, and she is co-chairman of a campaign called STOP HONORCIDE! that was launched on Mother’s Day of this year. (The word “honorcide” makes no sense — it means killing honor, but we’ll give that a pass.)
Linda Ahmed is also a co-founded of Muslims Against Sharia, a group that seeks to reform Islam. There is great debate among experts about whether Islam is reformable, so we’ll leave that subject too, except to say we’re glad such a group exists. Here is some of what she says:
Ahmed: As you probably know, honor killings or honorcides are common in non-Western cultures. Even fairly westernized countries like Turkey have a huge honorcide problem. When non-Westerners move to the Western countries, they bring with them their traditions, honorcide being one of those “traditions”.
Unfortunately Western media is downplaying honorcide problem in the West for fear of offending immigrant populations. You don’t hear names like Amina & Sarah Said, Aqsa Perves, Morsal Obeidi, or Hatin Surucu on evening news.
Honorcide is ignored to such degree that a proponent of honorcide could be prominently featured on an American presidential campaign website. The idea behind this campaign is to attract attention to this problem and to prosecute honorcides to the fullest extent of the law.
She wants to use existing hate-crime laws to do this.
Muslims Against Sharia have no opinion on necessity of the hate-crime laws, but since these laws exist, why not put them to good use? It doesn’t cost much to amend existing hate-crime legislations to include honorcide, but the benefits are tremendous. First, these amendments will shed much needed light on the problem. Second, if that’s not done, it won’t be long before some clever lawyer will figure out the way to present honorcide as a cultural tradition and use it a mitigating factor. Amending the legislations will make sure that the cultural/traditional nonsense is never used in such way.
Such a person as Linda Ahmed is needed here in the United States, but needed more desperately in Sweden. As she tells it,
With one of the highest percentages of Muslims in Europe and very liberal immigration policies, Sweden is becoming one of the primary destinations for economic refugees from Islamic countries. While most of the new Muslim immigrants are not Islamists, upon arrival in Sweden, they fall under influence of radical imams who control the majority of Swedish mosques and Islamic cultural centers.
Thus, radicalization of Swedish Muslims is proceeding at an increasingly alarming rate. I believe that majority of Swedish Muslim want to live in an Islamic state governed by Sharia rather than in a democracy governed by a secular government. But if you want to live under Sharia, go to Saudi Arabia or Iran; do not attempt to change my home country.
And she doesn’t mess around when she prescribes what to do:
Any person from a country where a substantial part of the population is pro-Sharia should not be allowed in the West, not only as an immigrant, but even as a visitor with a few exceptions, i.e., political asylum or as a diplomat etc.
A person claiming political asylum should be thoroughly screened and evaluated and if accepted, accepted on probationary basis long enough to establish his/her loyalty.
Every illegal immigrant should be immediately kicked out. Every legal immigrant should be allowed to stay only if he/she did not display desire to establish a Sharia state in a host country. Any naturalized citizen who displays a desire to establish a Sharia state in a host country should have his/her citizenship revoked and promptly deported. I think the latter two groups is where the real danger lies.
That’s my kind of Muslim. Go, Linda.
Posted in Muslim refugees, diversity's dark side | 2 Comments »