Ten reasons for a moratorium on refugee admissions in 2013

This is the comment I sent to the US State Department yesterday to be included in their record of the May 1 meeting where mostly contractors and refugee advocates make a pitch to the State Department to resettle more refugees from this country or that one to the US in FY2013.

I welcome readers to send me your comments to post publicly (before they disappear into a black hole at Foggy Bottom).

Ten Reasons there should be no refugees resettled in the US in FY2013—instead a moratorium should be put in place until the program is reformed and the economy completely recovers.

1)    There are no jobs. The program was never meant to be simply a way to import impoverished people to the US and place them on an already overtaxed welfare system.

2)     The program has become a cash cow for various “religious” organizations and other contractors who very often appear to care more about the next group of refugees coming in (and the cash that comes with each one) than the group they resettled only a few months earlier. Stories of refugees suffering throughout the US are rampant.

3)   Terrorist organizations (mostly Islamic) are using the program that still clearly has many failings in the security screening system.  Indeed consideration should be given to halting the resettlement of Muslims altogether.  Also, the UN should have no role in choosing refugees for the US.

4)    The public is not confident that screenings for potential terrorists (#3) or the incidences of other types of fraudulent entry are being properly and thoroughly investigated and stopped.  When fraud is uncovered—either fraud to enter the country or illegal activity once the refugee has been resettled—punishment should be immediate deportation.

5)     The agencies, specifically the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), is in complete disarray as regards its legally mandated requirement to report to Congress every year on how refugees are doing and where the millions of tax dollars are going that run the programThe last (and most recent) annual report to be sent to Congress is the 2008 report—so they are out of compliance for fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011.  A moratorium is necessary in order for the ORR to bring its records entirely up-to-date. Additionally,  there needs to be an adequate tracking system designed to gather required data—frankly some of the numbers reported for such measures of dependence on welfare as food stamp usage, cash assistance and employment status are nothing more than guesses.  (The lack of reports for recent years signals either bureaucratic incompetence and disregard for the law, or, causes one to wonder if there is something ORR is hiding.)

6)    The State Department and the ORR have so far failed to adequately determine and report (and track once the refugee has been admitted) the myriad communicable and costly-to-treat diseases entering the country with the refugee population.

7)   Congress needs to specifically disallow the use of the refugee program for other purposes of the US Government, especially using certain refugee populations to address unrelated foreign policy objectives—Uzbeks, Kosovars, Meshketians and Bhutanese (Nepalese) people come to mind.

8)   Congress needs to investigate and specifically disallow any connection between this program and big businesses looking for cheap and captive labor.  The federal government should not be acting as head-hunter for corporations.

9)     The Volag system should be completely abolished and the program should be run by state agencies with accountability to the public through their state legislatures. The system as presently constituted is surely unconstitutional.  (One of many benefits of turning the program over to a state agency is to break up the government/contractor revolving door that is being demonstrated now at both the State Department and ORR.)  The participating state agency’s job would be to find groups, churches, or individuals who would sponsor a refugee family completely for at least a year and monitor those sponsors. Their job would include making sure refugees are assimilating. A mechanism should be established that would allow a refugee to go home if he or she is unhappy or simply can’t make it in America. Short of a complete halt to resettlement-by-contractor, taxpayers should be protected by legally requiring financial audits of contractors and subcontractors on an annual basis.

10)   As part of #9, there needs to be established a process for alerting communities to the impending arrival of refugees that includes reports from the federal government (with local input) about the social and economic impact a certain new group of refugees will have on a city or town.   This report would be presented to the public through public hearings and the local government would have an opportunity to say ‘no.’


For these reasons and more, the Refugee admissions program should be placed on hold and a serious effort made by Congress to either scrap the whole thing or reform it during the moratorium.  My recommendation for 2013 is to stop the program now.  The Office of the President could indeed ask for hearings to review the Refugee Resettlement Act of 1980-–three decades is time enough to see its failings and determine if reauthorization is feasible or whether a whole new law needs to be written.

I suspect the major impediments to reform will be the contractors who make their living from the program (and use the refugees for political goals) and big business which has entwined itself with the federal agencies, the Volags and certain Members of Congress (on both sides of the political aisle) to keep the captive labor coming.

Note to readers:  So in the future you can readily find some of the comments sent to the State Dept., I have added a new category for testimony for this meeting and this will be the first entry.  Again, I would be happy to post your testimony here at RRW.

An afterthought:  Gee I should have mentioned the billion dollar plus price tag on this program that admits well under 100,000 “refugees” a year.   See my post from February!  Assuming 100,000 admissions (including 20,000 or so Cubans that are not normally included) which is high.  That is more than $10,000 of your dollars for every man, woman and child admitted—not including their costs to local communities in social services, health care, education, food stamps etc. etc.  What for?  So a few big meatpackers might have laborers!  So, a few big hotel chains have cheaper maid service!  So some contractors can make 6-figure salaries!

5 thoughts on “Ten reasons for a moratorium on refugee admissions in 2013

    1. Thanks for the plug… I did go to admin and spent all of about a minute trying to figure out how to link up with facebook. I guess I will have to first get a RRW facebook page and go from there. Twitter will come later.

      When I wrote about the changing demographics of the Buffalo area a few weeks ago, I began to see that what I have been writing about for nearly 5 years has already changed America. So, I also realize that I might have to write a detailed article and try to get it published at some online magazine. However that sort of writing is a huge amount of work compared with the easy little nuggets I post here. Mostly it is hard because how do I condense (for an audience that has never heard of any of this) what I have learned over the last 5 years and what has been happening for 30 YEARS!


  1. Talk about doing our job for us! The 10-point list submitted by RRW is simply splendid! How can you add to that? I was bleary-eyed busy with tax stuff the last few days, (and still), and missed the deadline completely. Guilty as charged.

    The entire immigration system, “legal” and illegal, is fraught with abuse, fraud, government agenda as interpreted by progressive/liberal dogma, use of scarce tax dollars for nonsense that no one asks for, and the overall stench created by Soros, our state department and the United Nations as they collaborate to push the United States to the edge of fiscal sanity.

    Quite simply, we do not need more people pushed to our shores for any reason, right now, and the consensus of those who pay the gaudy fare of the immigration industry, (us), is to STOP and let the country take a breath and look at this enormous problem. This is a crisis imposed on us by a radical few intent on reorganizing the world in their image, without consulting the citizens of the communities that are eventually imperiled by their actions.

    A thorough investigation of why there has been no ORR report since Obama took office, (three years). Given his record
    of removing from public view information that might cause damage to him and his cohorts, we must assume that this is the case that explains the absence of information that is vital to the proper gauging of immigration efforts.

    One must assume that there has been an increase in numbers, the publishing of which would cause angst with the public in view of the fact that we were allowing an excessive number to our shores in 2008, (the date of the last report). There is
    no way to justify anything but a dramatic reduction in the number of immigrants, by any means necessary,

    Tens of thousands of immigrants touch down on American soil, monthly, guaranteed a boost to their futures that millions of our own citizens cannot claim.


Comments are closed.