Refugee Resettlement Watch

Archbishop of Canterbury: UK plan to take 20,000 Syrians discriminates against Christian refugees

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 13, 2015

And, that is because, as we have told readers before, the United Nations refugee camps are housing Muslim Syrians and NOT Christians.  The US and now, according to UK Prime Minister David Cameron, Great Britain, are only taking the UN-chosen refugees from UN camps!

WElby

Another Christian leader gets it! Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby: US and UK Syrian refugee policy discriminates against Christian Syrians!

Why aren’t the Christians in the camps?  Because the Muslims “attack and target” the Christians in the camps run by the UNHCR.

If, during Sunday worship today, you hear from your pastor or priest about Syrian refugees (remember the Leftwing campaign we told you about yesterday), you must ask what the plan is for truly persecuted Christians and let your fellow congregants know that the US State Department has almost exclusively brought in Sunni Muslims so far!

From The Telegraph (emphasis is mine):

The Archbishop of Canterbury has warned David Cameron that his Government’s refugee policy is discriminating against Christians facing oppression in Syria.

The Most Rev Justin Welby is understood to have met the prime minister last week amid growing concerns that Christians in Syria will be largely excluded from the 20,000 refugees due to come to the UK over the next five years.

Archbishop Welby raised the issue with Mr Cameron at a private meeting last week, according to a well placed source, over concerns that Christians in Syria will not be given the opportunity to come to the UK.

The Government, in line with European Union policy, is committed to taking in refugees from UN camps in Syria and neighbouring countries. It cannot discriminate in favour of any one religious group.

But the Archbishop has raised concerns that Christians have avoided refugee camps because of fears of persecution from rogue Islamist groups operating inside refugee camps.

In a speech in the House of Lords last Monday, Archbishop Welby said that “within the camps there is significant intimidation and radicalisation, and many particularly of the Christian population who have been forced to flee are unable to be in the camps.”

[….]

“Christians are not to be found in the UN camps, because they have been attacked and targeted by Islamists and driven from them. They are seeking refuge in private homes, church buildings and with neighbours and family.”

A coalition of faith groups from 14 organisations has issued a statement accusing the US and UK governments of ignoring the plight of Christians and other ethnic minority groups by effectively failing to discriminate positively in their favour.

[….]

The coalition of groups said; “Many governments, including the US and UK, have proved unwilling to make provision for endangered religious minorities to be evacuated, despite private individuals, charities and churches offering to cover the costs of the resettlement.

“Government plans, including those of the UK, to accept refugees from UN camps in Syria will not address the problem, because Christians, and other minorities do not dare to live in those camps.”

There is more, continue reading here.

Why are US government-affiliated “religious charities” remaining silent on Christian persecution?

First, be sure to read about the brave Catholic Bishop in Hungary who is sounding the alarm about the Muslim invasion, here!  It is such a relief to know that not all Christian leaders have sold out to the Islamist agenda.

I know we can’t take in the whole world because even the US can’t afford it, but we are a Christian nation and Christians should be at the top of our priority list, don’t you think?

The so-called religious charities among our nine major resettlement contractors have never (to my knowledge in the last 8 years) ever expressed a concern for the Christians of the Middle East. If they had any guts they would say out loud to the Obama Administration—put the Christians (and other non-Muslim minorities) at the top of the list of those to be resettled in America.

One more thing!  If you are asked to open your home to a refugee or refugee family, remember, it will be a Muslim family (unless US resettlement policy changes) and expect to take care of them for a very long time at your personal expense!

Update:  More here on the Left using the Pope’s upcoming US visit as PR opportunity.

9 Responses to “Archbishop of Canterbury: UK plan to take 20,000 Syrians discriminates against Christian refugees”

  1. […] Source Ann Corcoran web blog Refugee Resettlement Watch […]

    Like

  2. conprof said

    Ann, why do you say people will have to take care of refugee families at their own expense – of course, I favor privatizing the refugee program so that Churches and individuals (after they are really properly vetted) can do real charity and real evangelization (as hard as that is if the refugees are Muslim – conversion puts a target on their heads and they might lose them), but I thought that everywhere except in SC and Wisconsiin, they are supported by state and local welfare programs. Not so? Or are you expecting SC type opt outs to become widespread? People do not have to worry about that, however, since any refugee who comes to your community under the present system, can qualify for benefits and the only way they can lose their benefits is by making too much money legally. A change in state law can only affect new refugees.

    BTW, just for the record, the “refugees” who come in through the UN/State Dept. RRP are not refugees once they leave the UN camps.

    By definition, a refugee is someone fleeing persecution who makes it to a safe state and stays there until they are able to return home. We are turning refugees into immigrants.

    Like

    • Ann Corcoran said

      It’s just my wishful thinking showing through (and not very clear writing). I want them to take full responsibility for the refugee they sponsor, that is real Christian charity.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. jstro61283 said

    The Pope can’t be embarrassed into servicing the needs of Christians. He’s undergone PC total immersion and probably wishes that he was Bernie Sanders. Good to see pushback from high profile Christians though.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Brittius said

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Like

  5. murlimews said

    Ahhh, I didn’t realize the Syrian ‘refugees’ were Sunni. Sounds like ethnic cleansing for the Shias!

    Like

  6. […] Archbishop of Canterbury: UK plan to take 20,000 Syrians discriminates against Christian refuge… September 13, 2015 […]

    Like

  7. lehi48 said

    In order to change policy , Obama is seeking his place in history and Kerry still dreams of political future. The Agencies complicit with the Christian discrimination or at the very least being “quiet” about it if you get my drift about the deep roots back to 1930s Germany/Europe/US State have strong vested interests
    The one element all have in common is they want to keep everything hush hush so their other goals reach fruition. If Church Leaders, Donors Foundations use some of the charity money to print a front page Advertisement in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune or Suntimes, Omaha Herald, LA Times, and so on exposing each one ; Obama, Kerry the Agencies The wholesale slaughter of Christians in Africa, MidEast, Asia under Islam , why, and that it continues today more than 5,10,100voices are needed

    Like

  8. […] RELATED ARTICLE: Archbishop of Canterbury: UK plan to take 20,000 Syrians discriminates against Christian refugees […]

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: