Refugee Resettlement Watch

Vast majority of US Muslims are Democrats, so why would Marco Rubio want more?

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 23, 2015

Julia Hahn, who has been doing a fantastic job at Breitbart on the UN/US State Department Refugee Admissions Program has another good article yesterday entitled, ‘REPORT: MUSLIMS ARE THE FASTEST GROWING IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY‘  (hat tip: Cathy).

Here is how she begins (with some much-needed data!):

Zuckerberg

Trump, never shy to speak up, said in August that the billionaire Facebook founder and No Borders advocate, Mark Zuckerberg, had his own personal US Senator—Marco Rubio. http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/donald-trump-marco-rubio-mark-zuckerberg-immigration/2015/08/18/id/670708/

“Muslims are the fastest growing bloc of immigrants, according to new census data published by the Center for Immigration Studies.

The report, which analyzes data from American Community Survey (ACS), finds that the foreign-born population in the U.S. hit a new record high 42.4 million in July 2014.

The report details that some of “the sending countries with the largest percentage increases in the number of immigrants living in the United States since 2010 were Saudi Arabia (up 93 percent); Bangladesh (up 37 percent); Iraq (up 36 percent); Egypt (up 25 percent); Pakistan, India, and Ethiopia (all up 24 percent); Nigeria and Ghana (both up 21 percent).”

“In contrast to most sending regions and countries, the number of immigrants from Europe and Canada declined,” the report notes.

As Breitbart News has previously documented, every year the United States voluntarily imports more than a quarter of a million– or 280,000– Muslim migrants. This number includes 117,423 migrants who were permanently resettled with Legal Permanent Resident status, as well as an additional 122,921 temporary Muslim workers and foreign students, and 39,932 Muslim refugee and asylees. This means that each year, the U.S. admits a number of Muslim migrants larger in size than the entire population of Des Moines, Iowa.”

Readers, although the number of refugees and asylees is lower than some other categories, remember that they are eligible for all forms of welfare immediately upon arrival as compared to those who entered under other legal immigration programs.  They also get a federal resettlement contracting agency to hold their hands as they sign up, so they are much more costly to the US taxpayer.

What is up with Rubio? 

Muslim immigrants (like most immigrants) are going to vote for Democrats, so why should Senator Marco Rubio be open to inviting more to America?   On the Syrian issue he squished out here earlier this month by saying he was “open” to taking in Syrians Muslims who are now swamping Europe.

Hahn continues at Breitbart:

According to Pew Research, only 11 percent of Muslim Americans identify as Republican or leaning-Republican, making them one of the most reliable Democrat voting blocs in the country.

[….]

Despite the fact only 11 percent of Muslim voters say that they “lean” Republican, many Republican presidential candidates would like to see the number of Muslim immigrants expanded even further.

For instance, GOP presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)—whose campaign predicts he will be in first place by February—has introduced a new foreign worker bill which would substantially increase Muslim immigration. His bill, known as the I-Squared bill, has been described as the “gold standard of high-tech reform,” by billionaire Mark Zuckerberg’s immigration lobbying group.

[….]

In addition, Rubio has also his argued that the United States should increase the number of poor Muslim migrants the United States admits as refugees— on top of the tens of thousands already admitted each year. Experts project that the cost of admitting just ten thousand additional refugees will cost U.S. taxpayers $6.5 billion dollars.

There is much more, continue reading here.

I have a hunch that Fox News is hankering for a Rubio/Fiorina ticket in 2016 (or at least that could be Fox owner Rupert Murdoch’s dream team), here.  Both could be counted on to do as they are told and support bringing in cheap immigrant labor for big business, something Murdoch has been openly supporting.

10 Responses to “Vast majority of US Muslims are Democrats, so why would Marco Rubio want more?”

  1. […] Turns out that the Democrat mayor is getting a tongue-lashing from the Republican Congressman, Rep. Mike Turner, whose district includes Dayton. (Some reports I read just now on Mayor Nan Whaley say she is planning a run for Congress.)  She may be looking for new reliably Democrat voters since the majority of Muslim refugees are voting for Democrats (see here). […]

    Like

  2. sturandot13 said

    Rubio – and Zuckerberg – can both take a very long walk off a short pier. Rubio is NOT eligible to run for president, as he is NOT a natural born citizen (born of two citizen parents). The whole idea behind this was to ensure no divided loyalty in the person who would be president of the U.S. Neither is Jindal. Neither is Cruz.

    And as for Zuckerberg… I wish ALL sites would STOP using FACEBOOK in order to see or to make comments. Boycott FACEBOOK.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. […] On a tip from Dragon’s Lair. Hat tip: Refugee Resettlement Watch. […]

    Like

  4. […] On a tip from Dragon’s Lair. Hat tip: Refugee Resettlement Watch. […]

    Like

  5. Dr. Rich Swier said

    Great. Posted: http://bit.ly/1G4sQlE

    Rich

    Like

  6. Skip Patel said

    Some Muslims have defected to the Dems. but since the time of IKE’s Muslim Brotherhood affair (http://tinyurl.com/4scrucn ) the Republicans have been the favoured party for US Muslims.

    This invasion is a truly bi-partisan betrayal.

    “As VOA reported in mid-2004, that 78% of Muslims who voted in the 2000 presidential election voted for Republican candidate George Bush.”

    http://middleeastvoices.voanews.com/2012/01/muslim-republicans/

    Like

    • Ann Corcoran said

      I suspect that was in the days of the Karl Rove/Grover Norquist power partnership …Rove and Norquist were (are) friends and it was Norquist who was working to put American Muslims in the Republican Party. I doubt that anyone who supports CAIR is in the Republican Party today. But, I sure am not defending the GOP and we do know that the years for the most Somalis entering the US were in the George W. Presidency.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Ray Rigsby said

    “Why would he want more?” Really? Maybe because he’s just another career politician who will do anything, including selling out this country, to better himself and his career.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Rubio doesn’t qualify to run for president and
    I don’t know why this is not being addressed.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Brittius said

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: