Refugee Resettlement Watch

Resistance growing to refugee resettlement as federal program “cost shifts” expenses to state and local taxpayers

Posted by Ann Corcoran on October 9, 2015

Fox News reporter, Melissa Jacobs, posted a very useful piece earlier this week entitled, ‘Obama’s refugee resettlement plan could stir battle with states.

Here is a bit that interested me (be sure to read the whole thing because she mentions several states and local communities resisting the resettlement of more refugees.  See if your city or state gets a mention!).

The Obama administration’s pledge to absorb thousands more Syrian and other refugees could run headlong into resistance from state and local officials worried about whether their communities can handle the influx.

[….]

“It’s a fiscal issue,” said Peter Steele, a spokesman for Maine Gov. Paul LePage. “You can only pay for what you can afford, and those funds should be going to the most needy citizens in our state.”

Don Barnett

Center for Immigration Studies Fellow, Don Barnett: Time for refugee program to come out of the shadows. https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/wyoming-op-ed-time-for-the-refugee-program-to-come-out-of-the-shadows/

[….]

…. pushback from the states could pose practical challenges.

According to a 1980 law, states can opt out of the program and need to be consulted in the process. However, Don Barnett, a fellow with the Center for Immigration Studies, describes refugee resettlement as a “secretive” and lucrative business for “non-profits” who operate with little coordination with state and local communities.

“In every encounter I’ve had with resettlement representatives, they will say if the locality doesn’t want it, we won’t resettle them — but this hasn’t been tested,” Barnett said.

Concern about the funding burden falling on local governments is hardly new.

The 1981 Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy noted, “Many state and local officials are concerned that the costs of resettlement assistance will continue beyond the period of federal reimbursement and that the burden of providing services will then fall upon their governments.”

“There is a complete cost shift to the states,” Barnett said.

Indeed, federal funding, extended for 36 months at the beginning of the program, dropped to the current eight-month period by 1991. The Heritage Foundation estimates the total lifetime cost of government benefits at $6.5 billion per 10,000 refugees.

See Julia Hahn at Breitbart, here, for more on the Heritage Foundation study.

8 Responses to “Resistance growing to refugee resettlement as federal program “cost shifts” expenses to state and local taxpayers”

  1. […] Source: Resistance growing to refugee resettlement as federal program “cost shifts” expenses to state an… […]

    Like

  2. Don Barnett and Joanne Bregman are heroes for finding the information that will not be revealed by the “media” nor Governor Haslam.

    Like

  3. […] Source: Resistance growing to refugee resettlement as federal program “cost shifts” expenses to state an… […]

    Like

  4. Brittius said

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Like

  5. tomasrose said

    This needs to become a topic in the presidential race.

    Like

  6. Dr. Rich Swier said

    Great. Posted: http://bit.ly/1PkRO7L

    Rich

    Like

  7. […] WAIT, THERE’S MORE… […]

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: