Refugee Resettlement Watch

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 5,915 other followers

  • Reaching me by mail

    You can reach me by e-mail here:

    (But my inbox is so overloaded most of the time, it is hard to keep up.)

    Or, since some of you have asked, I have a post office box and you can reach me there by snail mail!

    Ann Corcoran
    P.O. Box 55
    Fairplay, MD 21733

  • Social

  • Refugee Info Resource

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 8,055,028 hits

WND: 100 cities vying for immigrants (legal and illegal) expecting them to boost local economy

Posted by Ann Corcoran on November 3, 2015

No, they won’t boost the economy.  The whole idea is a myth!  The only boost I can see is that the local economy might benefit from the welfare dollars and other federal government supported programs to build low income housing (boodle for local developers!) and to give immigrants special loans to start businesses (that aren’t offered to low-income Americans)—dollars that arrive in the struggling cities from Washington.  Oh, and of course (almost forgot) bring in cheap labor to satisfy big business and the Chambers of Commerce.

Wealth redistribution?

Washington doesn’t grow money on trees—it is just your money being recycled for the benefit of the expanding immigrant population and the Left-leaning local governments.

Nancy Pelosi

This article reminded me of Nancy Pelosi. Do you remember when she famously said an expanding food stamp program helped the economy? She is essentially saying that the government needs to take your tax dollars and redistribute them to immigrants and then your money enters the economy of these struggling cities.

Leo Hohmann at World Net Daily features Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake as his opening ‘star’ of the story.   We told you about Rawlings-Blake here on Sunday.

Hohmann found this list of 100 cities vying for your money (collected by the IRS in Washington and doled out to myriad local welfare programs and through grants to state and local governments and to non-profits).

Please look at this list!  Is your city on it?

Hohmann goes on to report on the 18 mayors looking for a large allotment of Syrian refugees.

….a coalition of 100 immigrant-supporting cities seem to be in competition with each other to see which city can offer the most services and benefits to attract foreign-born residents.

They help them find jobs, overcome language barriers and work around employers’ demands for birth certificates or drivers’ licenses. There are also grants to help them get set up in a business venture.

So it’s no surprise that Rawlings-Blake is one of the 100 U.S. mayors asking the Obama administration to send her city a fresh wave of Syrian refugees. She is one of 18 mayors who have written a letter to the administration expressing their desire for more refugees. The 18 mayors who signed the letter represent a total of 100 mayors with Cities United for Immigration Action.

Continue reading (almost 1,000 comments in less than 24 hours).  Hohmann reports some very good research by the Center for Immigration Studies on welfare use by immigrants, and he quotes me saying that this whole notion of boosting a local economy makes no logical sense if you include all the COSTS associated with the resettlement of third worlders and if you take out the federal taxpayers’ contribution.

8 Responses to “WND: 100 cities vying for immigrants (legal and illegal) expecting them to boost local economy”

  1. […]… […]


  2. […] Source: WND: 100 cities vying for immigrants (legal and illegal) expecting them to boost local economy « Re… […]


  3. Hp B said

    C’mon man, they don’t expect these to boost the economy, that’s nonsense. They’re counting on an increase in welfare dollars(tax dollars) required to support them to boost the economy.
    (even that’s a lie)
    BureaucRat survival and expansion is paramount!


  4. Take a good look at what’s happening in Europe and ask yourself WHY would anyone in their RIGHT mind want to do that.


  5. Its easy enough to buy off some cities once the Federal Govt has sold us all out.


  6. sturandot13 said

    Tell me again, what the definition of “insanity” is? sarc/off


  7. domstudent11 said

    Excellent list! Of course Chicago is no surprise, but Highland Park? Dolton? HP is quite affluent, but it borders Highwood, which has a very high illegal immigrant population. Dolton is in the south suburbs of Chicago with a high minority population. Why would they want more low income people? Makes no sense.


  8. […] WND: 100 cities vying for immigrants (legal and illegal) expecting them to boost local economy […]


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: