Refugee Resettlement Watch

NGOs called out, care more about flooding Europe with ‘diversity’ then with the well-being of refugees

Posted by Ann Corcoran on April 24, 2016

Invasion of Europe news…..

I didn’t know that major international ‘humanitarian’ organizations had threatened to quit helping refugees in Greece in protest against the German/Turkish deal to return many migrants to Turkey.

wifi-on-lesbos

US resettlement contractor, the International Rescue Committee, tells us that one of the first questions the ‘starving, persecuted refugees’ ask when they arrive in Greece is “do you have wi-fi?” https://medium.com/uprooted/what-refugees-ask-when-they-arrive-in-europe-e09c72c80ea9#.vmld1rhv0

But (whether true or not), the important thing this article reaffirms is that legitimate refugees have a right to ask for care, they don’t have a right to go country shopping.

For instance, every ‘other-than-Mexican’ who arrives at the US Southern Border is NOT a candidate for asylum in the US (although they are being granted asylum) because they could have asked for asylum in Mexico or whatever FIRST safe country they came to in their flight.

If a Somali has traveled via the Middle East, to Russia, to Cuba, to somewhere in South America and then northward to our border, that person should not be granted asylum here.  If they were truly persecuted they could have asked for asylum in half a dozen other safe countries on that journey.

Likewise those migrants passing through Turkey, then hopping over to Greece, could claim asylum in Turkey (a SAFE country), but are instead shopping for a better deal in say Germany or Sweden.  They really don’t even want asylum in Greece.

Again, legitimate refugees do not have the right to shop for the country of their choice.  And, those who have no evidence that they are personally persecuted for one of several reasons have no right to ask for asylum (refugee status) at all.

So here is the article at Commentary Magazine from earlier this month about “rights groups” being exposed as, first and foremost, concerned with politics and changing Europe than with the care of individual refugees.

Israel and its supporters have argued for years that many “human rights” organizations are far less concerned with human rights than with pushing a political agenda. But as long as that political agenda consisted mainly of attacking Israel, most Westerners remained convinced that these groups still deserved their credibility and moral haloes.

[….]

The “human rights community” is outraged by the EU’s recent deal with Ankara, under which all migrants entering Europe via Turkey will be promptly returned there. The Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights, Nils Muiznieks, declared that such “automatic forced return” is “illegal,” and the only acceptable solution is for EU countries to “ramp up the relocation of asylum seekers” into their own borders. Human rights groups similarly asserted that the deal violates international humanitarian law, inter alia, because they claim Turkey is unsafe for refugees. Amnesty, for instance, termed the deal “abhorrent.”

Then, angry over the EU’s refusal to accept their view, the organizations halted assistance to tens of thousands of migrants already in Greece. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Medecins Sans Frontieres, the International Rescue Committee, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Save the Children all suspended operations in Greek refugee centers to protest the deal.

[….]

….if Turkey is willing to continue hosting these refugees in exchange for benefits like billions of euros and visa-free access to Europe, there’s no earthly reason why those refugees should be entitled to relocate to the EU instead. Indeed, if Turkey’s drawbacks suffice to entitle refugees to resettle in Europe, at least half the world’s population would be similarly entitled.

[….]

Similarly, refugees in Turkey don’t have it easy, but they’re surviving. Thus, relocating them to Europe isn’t necessary to fulfill the refugee convention’s goals; it’s necessary only to achieve a political purpose: remaking Europe by flooding it with millions of migrants.

Continue reading here.

Remember every person on the move around the world is NOT a refugee, but these organizations making a living in this industry want you to think they are. What we are witnessing in Europe is truly an invasion aided and abetted by the NGOs.

And, go here for our complete ‘Invasion of Europe’ archive.

6 Responses to “NGOs called out, care more about flooding Europe with ‘diversity’ then with the well-being of refugees”

  1. ourcatsgotfleas said

    Genuine refugees don’t country-shop. They make it to the nearest safe place to their own homes, and then they wait until it is safe to return.

    This is how you can tell a genuine refugee from an impostor.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. sodiumpen said

    Not only are “refugees” flooding Europe, those already there are seeking help in procreating. How many think they will be approved for IVF – after all – Austria doesn’t want to be “racist” does it? Coming to a USA city or town near you. . .

    “A couple in Austria with nine children, including two who are severely disabled, are allegedly requesting IVF treatment so they can have more.

    . . .The story has caused a heated debate in Austria, with some criticising the request from the family – who are originally from Afghanistan – as they already received around €5,682 ($6377) a month in benefits, according to the Krone newspaper.”

    http://www.thelocal.at/20160422/couple-in-austria-request-ivf-to-conceive-tenth-child

    Liked by 1 person

  3. […] NGOs called out, care more about flooding Europe with ‘diversity’ then with the well-being of re… […]

    Like

  4. Reblogged this on Rifleman III Journal.

    Like

  5. Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: