Refugee Resettlement Watch

“Alternative safe pathways” could bring ten times more Syrians to your towns than first proposed

Posted by Ann Corcoran on April 26, 2016

You knew didn’t you!  You knew that Obama and the United Nations would not be satisfied with a paltry 10,000 Syrian (mostly Sunni Muslim) “refugees” for your American towns this year!  (I had previously cheered the fact that Obama was seemingly dragging his feet and might not reach his goal. Many of you, loyal readers, would have none of it! You were right!)

obama and hillary

Obama will get ‘alternative safe pathways’ in place and Hillary will carry it out. My friends, stopping her is the only way we can save America.

Now comes news that the UN High Commissioner for Refugees is pushing a new concept (because the word ‘refugee’ has become a dirty word). It is called “safe pathways.”

This week Nayla Rush at the Center for Immigration Studies reported (see news here) on the backdoor scheme to try to trick Americans leery of opening their arms and wallets to thousands of inadequately screened Middle Eastern REFUGEES.

Besides speeding up the refugee screening process itself, they will just expand family reunification to third-cousins-once-removed (just kidding, but barely). They will give struggling colleges special deals to invite Syrian ‘students’ to room with your kids. And, this to sweeten the pot for greedy global corporations, give special worker visas for the creation of a mobile workforce.

Leo Hohmann writing at World Net Daily yesterday gives us all the gory details.  Here is how he begins:

President Obama and Congress have agreed to fund the permanent resettlement of 10,000 Syrian refugees, but the number of Syrians entering the U.S. over the next three years will end up being much larger.

Possibly up to 10 times larger, says one analyst who follows the global refugee movement. And it’s all about to be done under the radar of Congress with nearly zero media coverage.

Fresh evidence to that effect has come from the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees Filippo Grande and a statement by the U.S. State Department. Together, those statements indicate the U.N. has many more Syrians in store for the U.S. than what Obama has publicly acknowledged.

“Refugees” are out “safe pathways” are in!

“Often when they talk about numbers it’s a bit opaque,” says Nayla Rush, senior researcher for the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies. “They want to permanently resettle 480,000 (into countries outside of Syria), but that’s not enough. There will be resettlements but then other routes, ‘alternative safe pathways,’ as stated by the U.N. high commissioner, who is using a new word, ‘pathways.’

Continue reading here.

This is all that matters…..

If you are thinking that Obama has only a few months left, that is still plenty of time to get this in place for Hillary who, you know, will carry on his diabolical legacy of changing America by changing the people.

It is really important that you are aware of the stealthy plan to seed America for not just the remainder of Obama’s term, but for years to come, and vote as if your future depends on it!  It does, and not just yours, but your generations to follow!

12 Responses to ““Alternative safe pathways” could bring ten times more Syrians to your towns than first proposed”

  1. […] must refer you to RRW’s recent article “Alternative safe pathways” could bring ten times more Syrians to your towns than first proposed,” and also the recent WND […]

    Like

  2. […] ***Fox News is using the word ‘refugee’ loosely because Nicola appears to be getting around (the world) with a student visa not as a refugee.  But, in fact it is just such visas that the UN and the Obama Administration are looking to in order to increase rapidly the number of Syrians coming to the US, see here. […]

    Like

  3. […] “Alternative safe pathways” could bring ten times more Syrians to your towns than first propose… – “Refugees” are out “safe pathways” are in! […]

    Like

  4. […] “Alternative safe pathways” could bring ten times more Syrians to your towns than first propose… […]

    Like

  5. Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  6. Is anyone surprised? this whole “refugee” thing is just a way to get past negative public perceptions of “immigrants”, and we all know that elements within our government are absolutely determined to fill us up with these third world parasites, whatever they may name them. I do see a silver lining here, though. The fact that the globalists have hatched another renaming scheme to try and slip us more dangerous leeches shows that blogs like this one are getting the word out, despite monumental and extremely well funded efforts to suppress the truth. We need to keep blogging, editorializing, and otherwise getting the word out to whoever will listen, until we Americans regain control of our country, and make it safe and prosperous again.

    Like

    • Ann Corcoran said

      A message after my own heart! Everyone who can put together a sentence should be blogging, writing letters to the editor, making youtube clips (if that is your thing) and otherwise reaching out to everyone you know and don’t know! We must go around the corporate (right and left) media! And, you know, I do think we have begun to see the impact.

      Like

  7. 7delta said

    These people are stuck in the Orwellian Alternate Universe of Pretend and Pet Ostriches. I guess they don’t know that nobody buys the language updates they’re selling. Well, except for the relativist-compassion addicts who always snap up a “fix.”

    Next update: Calling anyone a “refugee” is hateful, racist, phobic, discriminatory and degrading of the humanity of people who are simply exercising their “right” to come to the U.S., or go anywhere they want, through alternate safe pathways. Future Universal Citizens. I’ll leave that acronym alone. So…

    Wonder what we should call them now? Alpays? ASP’s? SAP’s? Spatwas?

    Like

  8. jw burns said

    Ann, I clearly understand the need to push back on muslim immigration but why almost no recognition that hispanics are flooding over the border fail? 54 million in the country now with a third under 18.

    Like

    • Ann Corcoran said

      Mostly because this is a blog about “refugees” and not illegal immigration generally. I do write about the Unaccompanied alien minors but that is because the Left/Obama want them to be (falsely) designated as refugees.

      Liked by 1 person

      • jw burns said

        Ann, didn’t see this until just now. Understandable. To me its tomato/tomahto but its not my blog. This war needs to be fought on multiple fronts so its probably smart to tease out the threads.

        Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: