Refugee Resettlement Watch

Rutland, VT citizens hear from James Simpson in advance of heated public meeting

Posted by Ann Corcoran on May 26, 2016

This is not an exhaustive report on what happened in Rutland over the last two days.  I am sure we will have more later, but just wanted to let readers know that James Simpson was invited to speak in Rutland, VT this week (go here to see our previous posts). See also ‘Remaking Rutland’ at American Thinker, here.

Here is a news account from MyChamplainValley about Simpson’s presentation on Tuesday.

Vermont meeting

On the hotseat: Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program Director Amila Merdzanovic (left) and Stacie Blake, director of government and community relations at the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, speak at a meeting in Rutland. Photo by Elizabeth Hewitt/VTDigger

Then here are two accounts of the meeting held last night (Wed) by the Board of Alderman to further educate the public about the plan to bring 100 Syrians to Rutland this coming fiscal year. (See here and here).

The second of those links, here, at VTdigger is worth reading in its entirety because the whole idea of the secrecy with which this plan was hatched is discussed in some detail.

Note that they are holding a public meeting AFTER the plan has been sent to Washington. I bet the mayor hasn’t even seen that plan (the R & P Abstract)!

RUTLAND — In a heated public meeting Wednesday, the members of the Rutland Board of Aldermen and community members scrutinized a plan to resettle refugees in this central Vermont city.

While some came in support of the proposal, the majority raised objections to the way the plan had been formulated.

The proposal, announced by Mayor Chris Louras last month, would bring 100 Syrian refugees to Rutland for resettlement over the course of a year beginning in October.

Last week, the Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program submitted the proposal to resettle Syrians in Rutland to the federal government. They anticipate they will hear a response in July.

Many residents bristled at Louras’ approval of the project because he didn’t consult with city aldermen and they raised concerns about the impact the resettlement will have on the community.

In a meeting that stretched longer than three hours, the aldermen and residents expressed frustration with Louras’ decision, which they said was carried out behind closed doors and without an appropriate level of community input.

Amila Merdzanovic, the director of the Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program, and Stacie Blake, director of government and community relations at the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, answered questions from board and community members for hours Wednesday evening.

Continue reading here!

Be sure to see that USCRI rep Blake says refugees are not placed in unwelcoming communities…hmmmmm!

Also, just keep in mind that, at this very moment, plans for all of the old and new resettlement sites are being prepared and sent to Washington.  It is our contention that those plans (see the Reno plan here) should be released to the public in advance of going to Washington for approval for your money to be spent!

More later…..

6 Responses to “Rutland, VT citizens hear from James Simpson in advance of heated public meeting”

  1. […] Rutland, VT citizens hear from James Simpson in advance of heated public meeting May 26, 2016 […]

    Like

  2. […] as far as I know they have no one attending who will help develop the whole story asSimpson did in Rutland this […]

    Like

  3. […] Rutland, VT citizens hear from James Simpson in advance of heated public meeting May 26, 2016 […]

    Like

  4. wcfrg@att.net said

    Keep the Muslim Terrorists out of America!!!

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Liked by 1 person

  5. […] Rutland, VT citizens hear from James Simpson in advance of heated public meeting May 26, 2016 […]

    Like

  6. I think at these meetings, it should be know that any and all expenses beyond what the Federal govco pays…the contractor will get the bill…let them not pay, then sue them…and they will shut down via bankruptcy! This would end up in court of course, but bring light to unfunded mandates!

    Liked by 1 person

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: