Refugee Resettlement Watch

Refugee resettlement becomes major issue in Election 2016; death blow to Hillary?

Posted by Ann Corcoran on August 20, 2016

Putting a proposal for the resettlement of hundreds of thousands of third worlders, including large numbers who come from countries that hate us, squarely in front of the voters in the weeks before the November election could make or break a 2016 presidential candidate.

Obama’s September UN gambit comes as a huge political risk for the Hillary camp and her friends at the Refugee Council USA *** because by placing the hot topic so clearly before the public it could be like waving a red cape before a bull.  Hillary has already said she wants 65,000 Syrians admitted in one year and the public is overwhelmingly against ‘welcoming’ any more!

Early polling already indicates that the vast majority of Americans do not want more Syrian refugees brought to their towns. Will the Obama UN propaganda stunt serve to wake up even more Americans to the nature of this program? We think so.

Nezer

Melanie Nezer (left) of the Hebrew Aid Society is the present chairman of the Refugee Council USA which is a consortium of open border groups including the nine major federal resettlement contractors. RCUSA lobbies Congress and the Administration for more money for their goal of changing America by changing the people. RCUSA will be busy on the Hill reaching out to Republicans who hold the purse strings.

Politico (a progressive leaning news outlet aimed at putting news in Congressional office waiting rooms) has published a story that is worth mentioning here, not so much for what it says, but for what it implies.

Reporter Nahal Toosi tells us much we already know, but what interested me most is the mention (a hint really) of the fact that by pushing for more than a doubling of refugees to be admitted to the US in 2017, the resettlement industry will be front and center in Election 2016.

By advocating so strongly with a rally next weekend and then the Obama UN shindig in September, will the industry become fully exposed to an attack from Trump as Americans increasingly begin to understand how secretive this program has been and how much they are shelling out to bring poverty and possible insecurity to their hometowns, not to mention the maddening fact that most refugees immediately receive all welfare available to Americans including SSI for the elderly and disabled?

It is remarkable to me that the more than 3-decades-old refugee program could make or break an American presidential candidate—and it could if Trump makes the most of  Obama’s UN stunt and Hillary’s on-the-record support for 65,000 Syrians to be admitted to the US in one year!

Here (below) are some snips from Politico that interested me.  The refugee industry wants to nearly triple the number of refugees admitted to the US to 200,000. They are urging Obama to make that determination in September, the month when presidents by law send their refugee wish list to Congress.

The average number of refugees admitted throughout most of Obama’s presidency has been 70,000 per year.

[Editor note: there is a  lot of confusion about numbers.  We are discussing only those refugees admitted through this one program and not considering the tens of thousands of successful asylum seekers and another 100,000 or so unaccompanied alien children the administration refers to as “humanitarian arrivals.”  This 200,000 also does not include the hundreds of thousands entering through myriad visa programs.]

Politico (emphasis is mine):

Some are calling on Obama to admit at least 200,000 refugees from around the world, including tens of thousands of Syrians, through the U.S. refugee resettlement program and other routes. That’s effectively twice as many total refugees as the Obama administration has planned to accept in the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.

[….]

Obama also is preparing to host a Sept. 20 international summit on the world’s migration crisis, a meeting in which he is expected to urge other countries to double their intake of refugees. The gathering will be held on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in New York City, just weeks before the end of a U.S. presidential campaign in which Republican nominee Donald Trump has made refugees an incendiary topic.

[….]

Shannon Scribner, a top official with Oxfam America, said her sense is that, despite pressure from activists, Obama is unlikely to go beyond 100,000 total refugees. One reason is that Congress controls the funding for the refugee resettlement program, and Republicans could kill any request for more money, she noted.

[….]

Trump has embraced the backlash against refugees in Europe, too — openly rooting for the British exit from the EU and comparing Clinton to Angela Merkel, the German chancellor who has emerged as the symbol of the continent’s initially welcoming stance toward the Syrian influx.

[….]

Obama likely will use the daylong summit in September, which will come on the heels of a similar U.N. summit, to push for more out-of-the-box efforts to help the world’s refugees.

[….]

“This could be one of the great Trojan horses,” Trump said of the refugee program. He has also accused Clinton of wanting to spend “hundreds of billions of dollars to settle Middle Eastern refugees in the United States” — a claim that independent fact checkers have debunked — and dinged her repeatedly for calling last September for the U.S. to admit 65,000 properly screened Syrian refugees, a 550 percent increase over Obama’s figure. [The only error in Trump’s comment is the word ‘hundreds,’ leave that out and Trump is correct—this will cost US taxpayer BILLIONS!—ed]

[….]

The September summit gives refugee advocates another chance to boost momentum for their cause. Some groups are hoping in particular to rebuild trust in the refugee program among Republicans, with outreach efforts on Capitol Hill.

At the same time, the summit could re-ignite the partisan debate, especially on the presidential campaign trail.

Help re-ignite the partisan debate!

Here is what you need to remember:  in the next 10 weeks, you have to make as much political noise as you can about the UN/US State Department Refugee Admissions Program where you live! 

You must work hard to get your concerns and the controversy out to the media in whatever way you can!  That means all media!  If you can’t get to your local Leftwing controlled newspaper, find other avenues to reach your fellow citizens even if you have to hand out fliers at the county fair!

And, then this is key! Get your ‘noise’ to your Senators and Members of Congress.  Your House members are all up for election and THEY CONTROL THE PURSE STRINGS.  I know you are saying to me that your Member is a chicken or worse.  That doesn’t matter, make their lives miserable!  They are home now until right after Labor Day.  Find them! Go to their offices, picket the office if necessary, meet them at the local county fair, attend any townhall they hold and hammer them on this one issue!

Afterall, Politico is telling us that the Open Borders Refugee Industry is going to be hitting Republican offices on Capitol Hill because they know that the only way they can win is to get Congress (Speaker Paul Ryan!) to fund 200,000 or more refugee arrivals!

You must out maneuver them!  Remember:

They need your money to change America!

*** Here are the members of the Refugee Council USA (federal resettlement contractors being paid by the head to place refugees in your towns are in red, they have a vested financial interest in bringing in ever larger numbers of refugees):

Member Organizations

 

11 Responses to “Refugee resettlement becomes major issue in Election 2016; death blow to Hillary?”

  1. […] Refugee program is major issue for (the) November election!  Your member of Congress is home right now (for the next two weeks) […]

    Like

  2. […] Refugee program is major issue for November election!  Your member of Congress is home right now (for the next two weeks) and […]

    Like

  3. […] Refugee resettlement becomes major issue in Election 2016; death blow to Hillary? August 20, 2016 […]

    Like

  4. Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  5. domstudent11 said

    In many news articles, reporters confuse ELCA with LCMS (Evangelical Lutheran Church of America and Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod). The two synods are completely different. ELCA is more concerned with “social justice” while LCMS is more concerned with mission work. ELCA is advocating a two state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with a “call for an end to Israeli settlement building and the occupation of Palestinian land, both of which violate international law;” LCMS, on the other hand, has historically taught that Jews are God’s chosen people and Israel is their God-given land. LCMS is more concerned with reaching people spiritually, while ECLA is a more political organization. I wish reporters would not lump all Lutherans together. ECLA is extremely liberal and was formed in 1988 because of a split within the Lutheran church.

    Like

    • Ann Corcoran said

      I occasionally can be faulted for lumping them together because I want the good Lutherans to rise up and demand that the others find another name. Heck, in two states Lutheran Social Services has already dropped the ‘Lutheran’ from its name. Come on good and spiritual Lutherans stand up for yourselves and continue to help spread the truth about the “social justice” types masquerading as Lutherans.

      Liked by 2 people

      • domstudent11 said

        I don’t see how ELCA can keep it’s tax exempt status if it keeps advocating for political positions. I found a great website called “Exposing the ELCA.” Shockingly, ELCA recently recommends encouraging “his church’s members, congregations, synods, and agencies to call on the U.S. President to recognize the State of Palestine and not prevent the application of the State of Palestine for full membership in the United Nations.” Kind of an odd position for a church. I am LCMS, by the way.

        Like

  6. Reblogged this on .

    Like

  7. sidefxny said

    Ann- just keep pounding. I think they are starting to get the message. Trump just made another very good move bringing in Steve Bannon and Kellyann Conway for this phase of the election. He is just brilliant and only a fool would underestimate him. Breitbart has been unashamedly pro Trump all along and they are one of the few media outlets that reports the truth about immigration and RIT in some very hard hitting stories.

    Example- Pam Geller’s reporting on the little girl from Twin Falls who was brutally raped (that’s what I call it) by those vicious savages posing as needy refugees. Breitbart London is sometimes the only place that reports on the jihad that is taking place in Europe. I don’t have to tell you of course.

    I sincerely hope that someone in the Trump camp is keeping track of all your articles and that they bring you in as an advisor on what I call “refu-jihad”.

    Like

  8. Need to know: Police arrest 900 Syrians in England and Wales for crimes including rape and child abuse: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/695066/Police-arrest-900-Syrians-in-England-and-Wales-for-rape-death-threats-and-child-abuse

    Like

  9. Something you need to know about immigration: Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: