Refugee Resettlement Watch

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 5,910 other followers

  • Reaching me by mail

    You can reach me by e-mail here:

    (But my inbox is so overloaded most of the time, it is hard to keep up.)

    Or, since some of you have asked, I have a post office box and you can reach me there by snail mail!

    Ann Corcoran
    P.O. Box 55
    Fairplay, MD 21733

  • Social

  • Refugee Info Resource

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 8,039,463 hits

Merkel’s mess: German companies not hiring refugees

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 14, 2016

Invasion of Europe news….

Angela Merkel was telling anyone who would listen that Germany would welcome any Middle Easterners and Africans who could get there.  She wanted to be a humanitarian, but she claimed Germany needed more workers as well.  Looks like she was very very wrong about that.  In fact, this issue of bringing in hundreds of thousands of low-skilled workers (as the US is doing too) is a ticking time bomb!


Merkel, fighting for her political life. You know what struck me so funny, as I sorted through photos of Frau Merkel, is that like Hillary she has some astounding facial expressions. Could she have the same affliction that Hillary has, whatever that is?

What with innovation in the workplace requiring fewer such workers and welfare systems being strained worldwide, what will happen to all these unhappy foreigners who have neither cultural roots nor upward mobility in their new countries.

It continues to escape me why this migration project, pushed by the international Left and supported by leaders like Merkel, is humane in any way! 

From Reuters (hat tip: Joanne):

Germany’s blue-chip companies will have to explain to Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday why they have managed to hire fewer than 100 refugees after around a million arrived in the country last year.

Merkel, fighting for her political life over her open-door policy, has summoned the bosses of some of Germany’s biggest companies to Berlin to account for their lack of action and exchange ideas about how they can do better.

Many of the companies say a lack of German-language skills, the inability of most refugees to prove any qualifications, and uncertainty about their permission to stay in the country mean

A survey by Reuters of the 30 companies in Germany’s DAX stock market index found they could point to just 63 refugee hires in total. Several of the 26 firms who responded said they considered it discriminatory to ask about applicants’ migration history, so they did not know whether they employed refugees or how many.

Of the 63 hires, 50 are employed by Deutsche Post DHL, which said it applied a “pragmatic approach” and deployed the refugees to sort and deliver letters and parcels.

“Given that around 80 percent of asylum seekers are not highly qualified and may not yet have a high level of German proficiency, we have primarily offered jobs that do not require technical skills or a considerable amount of interaction in German,” a spokesman said by email.

What is clear is that early optimism that the wave of migrants could boost economic growth and help ease a skills shortage in Germany – where the working-age population is projected to shrink by 6 million people by 2030 – is evaporating.

More here.

We have very large files on the Invasion of Europe (here) and on Germany (here).

14 Responses to “Merkel’s mess: German companies not hiring refugees”

  1. EdwardTeach said

    Sign this petition and post it everywhere.Rücktritt der dt. Bundeskanzlerin Dr. Angela Merkel und sofortige Neuwahl der BundesregierungSign

    This madness must be stopped!!
    Please watch this and see if you like and want this for your family.


  2. Germany is committing suicide by invasion. I’m sorry for the German people, but when masters attempt to oppress citizens, citizens must fight back. Look at the story on Breitbart regarding the local costs of educating refugees, illegal aliens because of the Supreme Court’s Plyler v. Doe decision, it’s aggravating when American children are denied educational support in order to educate foreign countries’ citizens!

    I urge all to contact both Senators and your Representative in the House before 9/30/2016 and tell them you want Refugee Resettlement defunded and eliminated until specific controls exist, and vetting is 1) accurate, 2) independent and information on such “refugees” is 3) corroborated by an independent source.

    Thanks, Ann, for your tremendous work explaining the CR phenomenon as it relates to the Refugee Racket. Most Americans, even those of us highly tuned into DC, do not understand or have awareness of the budget process and the many tricks played on Americans by Congress. I am so happy to have influenced many of my Catholic relatives into withholding support for various Catholic bishops “funding drives” until they receive explicit and transparent information on just HOW their money is spent. Too often, we simply believe that throwing money at something makes it better. As we have witnessed with RRW, the black hole of financial responsibility disappears when the conversation is framed as one of “compassion” rather than sound judgement.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. sidefxny said

    The whole concept of importing these savages to replace an aging German population was insane to begin with.

    If the working population drops to a certain point, so be it. In the natural order, things will work themselves out. Maybe the Government will have to start spending less money. Did these fools honestly ever believe that the barbarians would bring them wealth or stability?

    Of course not. This is all about imposing a New World Order as per Soros.


  4. Mi Licater said

    The purposeful importation of low- and no-skilled workers also creates an underclass in society, in addition to depressing wages for EVERYONE, creating more competition for those seeking employment, and increasing overall poverty.

    This is EXACTLY what totalitarians want: MORE people to control, and MORE people dependent on government.

    Any politician/bureaucrat who claims otherwise is LYING.




  6. Reblogged this on .


  7. EdwardTeach said

     Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table.

    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “far right” “racist” “Nazis” and “xenophobic”.  If they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Hint: A name will not destroy a country and it’s people. Europe, wake up and take a stand before it’s too late and you lose everything.

    Liked by 3 people

    • sturandot13 said

      The muzlim (sic – on purpose) invasion are hordes, not “hoards”. (To “hoard” means to squirrel away for a later date when such items might be scarce – like hoarding canned food, water, gasoline, etc.) That little bit of info. aside, I agree wholeheartedly with your comment.


  8. EdwardTeach said

    Angela Merkel has endangered Europeans for generations to come. My children and my children’s children will be forced to live in a police state to keep the muslims in line until the day their (the muslims) numbers have grown large enough to make us refugees.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Senatssekretär Freistaat Danzig said

    Reblogged this on behindertvertriebentessarzblog.


  10. Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.


  11. kerberos616 said

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: