Refugee Resettlement Watch

Obama’s 110,000 refugee plan for 2017 is a CEILING! A Trump administration could turn off the spigot

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 29, 2016

For all the years I’ve been writing RRW (9 now), I’ve seen the Open Borders advocates and the Resettlement contractors*** try to make the President’s proposed numbers (his determination) for the upcoming fiscal year a REQUIRED GOAL.  It is not! It is a CEILING. There is no requirement that they must reach that number and in fact most times they don’t.

leahy-and-durbin

If Donald Trump is elected and uses his power by cutting refugee admissions, expect much wailing and gnashing of teeth from Senators Dick Durban and Patrick Leahy, two of the most important members of the Senate welcoming tens of thousands of Middle Eastern and African refugees to your towns.

I’ve posted a table below from the Refugee Processing Center so you will have some idea what the ceiling was each year since 2006 and the number they hit.

By the way, failure to reach that number can usually be attributed to not enough resettlement sites and capacity in those sites (very often a limiting factor is the availability of enough cheap housing), or it might simply be that the UNHCR hasn’t processed enough refugees for us that year.

However, I doubt that this administration in its waning months is going to be responsible and consider capacity. 

My guess is that the refugee flow is going to be on steroids for October and in to November.

If Trump is elected they will go completely insane pouring people in here before his inauguration (unless in December the lame duck Congress severely curtails their funding).

To accommodate these vast new numbers Obama has proposed, and because they are wearing out their welcome in existing resettlement sites, we are hearing that there  are as many as 47 new targeted towns to be seeded with mostly Middle Eastern and African refugees.

The Continuing Resolution, being voted on this week, will give them enough money (since the Republican leadership has failed us) to get that ball rolling in the first few months. In fact, that ball will get rolling in two days, on October first!

What about Hillary’s 65,000 Syrians?

In yesterday’s hearing someone (Sen. Sessions?) asked about Hillary’s proposed 65,000 Syrians and if there had to be any “consultation” with Congress if she is elected and wants to bring that many in the opening days of her administration. The answer is yes, probably, but what the hell is Congress going to do other than say, ‘thanks for stopping by and informing us!’  Congress’ only recourse is to stop the funding! Don’t hold your breath!

Conversely, because the Refugee Admissions Program is heavily weighted toward the President’s wishes, if Donald Trump should be elected, he has great leeway to cut back, or even propose a moratorium on Obama’s 110,000 goal. He does not have to reach the ceiling!

Of course, he would have to “consult” Congress too.  The likes of Senators Patrick Leahy and Dick Durban will be WAILING! (That would be fun to see!)

So, bottomline, Donald Trump must win the Presidency and Congress must cut the funding for the program, or we are finished.

Here is the table I mentioned above.  You will be looking at the columns labeled “ceiling” and “admitted.”

 

 

screenshot-26

 

The table above is through August 31, 2016. As of today, September 29th, the FY 2016 admissions are at 84,870 with the Syrians at 12,571 (Refugee Processing Center). When you are looking at the table, note also how they completely stress-out towns (local health departments, schools, etc.) by bringing in large new batches of refugees in the last two months of the fiscal year in their zeal to hit that ceiling.

One more thing!  Do you see how far off the mark they were in 2011, that is because those two Iraqi refugee terrorists were discovered living in Kentucky and much security screening had to be repeated.

***For new readers these are the nine federal resettlement contractors who rely almost completely on funding from you, the taxpayer:

28 Responses to “Obama’s 110,000 refugee plan for 2017 is a CEILING! A Trump administration could turn off the spigot”

  1. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees […]

    Like

  2. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees since 2006. The October average is traditionally the […]

    Like

  3. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees since 2006. The October average is traditionally the […]

    Like

  4. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees since 2006. The October average is traditionally the […]

    Like

  5. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees since 2006. The October average is traditionally the […]

    Like

  6. […] post from last week shows the monthly admissions of refugees since 2006. The October average is traditionally the […]

    Like

  7. […] who were delayed would be included in the coming fiscal year, which begins October 1.  [See our post of a week ago about the “ceiling” each […]

    Like

  8. […] my post of last week on Obama’s FY2017 110,000 ceiling and how Trump can drop […]

    Like

  9. […] my post of last week on Obama’s FY2017 110,000 ceiling and how Trump can drop […]

    Like

  10. […] who were delayed would be included in the coming fiscal year, which begins October 1.  [See our post of a week ago about the “ceiling” each […]

    Like

  11. […] the other day I wrote about the fact that the number determined by the President at the end of the fiscal year for the […]

    Like

  12. […] the other day I wrote about the fact that the number determined by the President at the end of the fiscal year for the […]

    Like

  13. […] Obama’s 110,000 refugee plan for 2017 is a CEILING! A Trump administration could turn off the&… September 29, 2016 […]

    Like

  14. Found a wealth of information here: http://www.wrapsnet.org/Reports/ConsolidatedPlacementPlan/tabid/318/Default.aspx.

    Click on the first link on this page – Consolidated placement plan summary by city FY 2016.

    Thanks Ann for all you do! I am trying to spread the word.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Obama can PAY for them, same with Hillary who has that “charity” she LAUNDERS BRIBES through. TAKE their money.
    Then tell your local his collection plate will be empty if he/she/it does not protect the FLOCK.
    The Politicians assume PERSONAL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY for the crimes of ILLEGALS that they “sponsor” through their “sanctuary” laws and by importing REFUJIHADIS from abroad.
    By WHAT authority are they manipulating Society? Where in the Constitution are they allowed to “SOCIAL ENGINEER”?
    “our” politicians take oaths to uphold the LAW and the Constitution. When they REFUSE to, when they openly DEFY and circumvent the LAW, they FORFEIT their “Governmental Immunity”. Every Politician who goes on record as supporting ILLEGAL INVADERS should be held financially responsible for PAYING REPARATIONS for the crimes done by the ILLEGALS.
    http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/city-rips-secret-planting-of-syrian-refugees/
    ALL immigrants must have SPONSORS who will be accountable for the actions of the immigrant. Supporters of ILLEGALS are ASSUMING SPONSORSHIP of all Illegals and therefore are FINANCIALLY responsible for CRIMES and LIFE SUPPORT of ALL illegals. NO illegals should be on TAXPAYER DOLE, they should be living on the wealth of their SPONSORS and in THEIR HOUSES.
    http://investmentwatchblog.com/muslim-refugees-causing-rape-epidemic-in-the-u-s-this-is-why-we-need-a-fcking-wall/
    Start CIVIL FORFEITURE on the assets of Politicians that cover for ILLEGAL INVADERS. Since their “Government DUTIES consist of securing the Border” and they not only failed but REFUSE to secure the border they are no longer protected by “immunity”

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Toni said

    Dear Ms. Corcoran, firstly, thank you for all you do. Your emails and your writings have gotten me totally involved with the happenings in our country. Thank you.

    In regard to the R&P Abstract, I have called my Congressman and was impressed that the office did call me back within a week. Unfortunately, in order for me to get a copy of said document I need to call the State Dept. and request a Freedom of Act form, fill it out and then wait to see if I will get this copy. I will try and get this done.

    On the president giving over control of the internet to ICAN, I have called all my party congressmen throughout my state, not just my district. All are in favor of Senator Cruz`s legislation. That is a plus.

    I am just writing this to let you know that all you do has encouraged me to walk the walk. I have been involved in state and country goings on, ie, common core, parrc testing, transgender issues, etc., but you have motivated me to do even more.

    Keep up the good work. I am so in awe of you and how you get it all done.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ann Corcoran said

      Hi Toni, I’m going to e-mail you privately. If you do a FOIA to the US State Department you will be waiting for years. And, frankly your US Congressman should have an interest himself/herself in who is coming to your area.

      Like

  17. Judy OHare said

    Are you sick of this yet?? As far as I know a letter referred to in this link was only signed by 27 of the 247 Republicans in the House…….why are they not doing all they can to use the ‘pwer of the purse’ to stop this funding? http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/only-37-republicans-back-plan-to-defund-muslim-refugees/…………Call Jordan’s office and ask what they are doing……………………202-225-2676……..and ask why he didn’t sign the letter

    Ann Corcoran posted: “For all the years I’ve been writing RRW (9 now), I’ve > seen the Open Borders advocates and the Resettlement contractors*** try to > make the President’s proposed numbers (his determination) for the upcoming > fiscal year a REQUIRED GOAL. It is not! It is a CE” >

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ann Corcoran said

      We do not know all of the 47 new sites and that is because they are kept secret for the most part until its too late for communities to fight back. We know about 7 or 8 of them and I’ll be posting on that later today. It is incumbent on you to pay attention to news in your local communities. There is often a hint in the local newspaper or even in your churches and sometimes there is actually a community meeting ginned up to put their propaganda spin on the program before you can alert people to the problems with it… more later.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Reblogged this on .

    Like

  19. TakeBackOurRepublic said

    Do you know, and if so can you advise your readers, the names of the 47 towns? Pockets of resistance need to form BEFORE they are seeded.

    “……because they are wearing out their welcome in existing resettlement sites, we are hearing that there are as many as 47 new targeted towns…..”

    On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Refugee Resettlement Watch wrote:

    > Ann Corcoran posted: “For all the years I’ve been writing RRW (9 now), > I’ve seen the Open Borders advocates and the Resettlement contractors*** > try to make the President’s proposed numbers (his determination) for the > upcoming fiscal year a REQUIRED GOAL. It is not! It is a CE” >

    Like

  20. Reblogged this on Hard Charger.

    Like

  21. kerberos616 said

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: