Refugee Resettlement Watch

350 refugees a day entering US (less than three weeks in to the fiscal year); Texas is numero uno!

Posted by Ann Corcoran on October 19, 2016

And at that rate we will have admitted 32,900 by Inauguration Day in January.  In that 350 a day stream are 47 Syrians (for a total of 852 so far).

Of the total (6,328) admitted in the last 18 days, 2,874 (45%) are some form of Muslim.

Of the 852 Syrians admitted, 837 (98%) are Muslims (mostly Sunni Muslims).

Texas tops the list by far!

This once more demonstrates that the governor, although apparently determined, has little power to slow the flow. In fact, I think the feds are shoving it down the throats of ‘unwelcoming’ governors, see Indiana below. Pence’s IN is not usually so high on the resettlement list.

Who has the power to slow the flow? Many members of the Texas Congressional delegation have the power if they wished to use it!

(Turning a red state blue with migrant colonists! How did it happen that Texas’s political leaders never saw this coming?)

 

screenshot-44

Map from the Refugee Processing Center shows where the 6,328 refugees have been distributed in first 18 days of Fiscal year 2017. (Hawaii is 3).

11 Responses to “350 refugees a day entering US (less than three weeks in to the fiscal year); Texas is numero uno!”

  1. […] and have made Texas once again the top resettlement state in the nation this fiscal year already, see here.  Make no mistake! This is about turning the red state […]

    Like

  2. tmasierrahills said

    So much for ‘Don’t mess with Texas!’

    Like

  3. […] and have made Texas once again the top resettlement state in the nation this fiscal year already, see here.  Make no mistake! This is about turning the red state […]

    Like

  4. […] […]

    Like

  5. Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  6. jfmoris110 said

    A contract is invalid if it requires illegal acts. Maybe a new Trump presidency could reverse the citizenships and immigrant status granted due to illegal acts of previous administration? Definetly the result of illegal acts by enforcement agencies, why should US be required to abide by unlawful agreements made by insane (D)irtbags running the previous administration?

    At the least he could stop the inflow even if “the money’s already spent, agreements have been made”. We NEED a major break of civility for dealing with the (D)irtbag party – the (R)s fear retaliation? How about reversing some decisions by the DOJ, or the pardons of criminals – why do we have to just go along with abusive uses of the govt. – the presidency of lord Ohole has proven there are no limits to what a president can do.

    Dealing with lowlifes, I have found, It is best to treat them as they treat others: lie to them, cheat them, verbally abusive behaviour – IT IS WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT. Any other way, and they are profiting by their asymmetric Alinskyite _ssholery.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Reblogged this on Hard Charger.

    Like

  8. Reblogged this on .

    Like

  9. Phyllis Mason said

    I wrote to the White House, objecting to incoming refugees. I received a reply from Obama stating that he does not agree with me.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: