Refugee Resettlement Watch

Starving the beast! Another way to set policy at the Department of State

Posted by Ann Corcoran on February 28, 2017

Politico is reporting that they are getting out their worry-beads all over the world as the Trump Administration works on its first budget.

Could this mean what we hope it means—a reduction in the millions of dollars we give away to the UNHCR while they dictate to us, telling us which refugees and how many America must take.

unhcr-headquarters-in-geneva

UN High Commissioner for Refugees huge glass-domed office building in Geneva, Switzerland. How many of your tax dollars, paid out through the DOS, keep this international organization going? Aid organizations seem to like nice buildings!

Politico (it is kind of cryptic, but hopeful sounding!):

U.S. diplomats and aid workers have been afraid that President Donald Trump wants to sideline them in favor of the military.

On Monday, they got even more reason for concern.

The Trump administration is developing a federal budget proposal the White House says will give defense programs a $54 billion boost while cutting funding to the other agencies, including the State Department, and especially foreign aid programs.

Lawmakers, foreign embassies and others were scrambling to get the details of the budget plan Monday. Officials at the State Department declined to share their budget reduction targets — it was not clear if the guidance had yet been delivered to them — but some reports forecast as much as 30 percent reduction, a devastating blow.

[….]

Funding for the State Department and foreign assistance falls under what’s called the “international affairs budget,” a category that doesn’t include the military. Those programs overseas — including everything from embassy security to pandemic prevention to refugee assistance via the United Nations — cost roughly $58.8 billion. The vast majority of that figure goes to the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

[….]

On a call with reporters, officials with the Office of Management and Budget noted that most federal agencies will be expected to trim their budgets. But they singled out foreign aid programs in particular, indicating the administration believes that other countries are merely taking advantage of the United States.

More here.

I wish I knew exactly how much the US Department of State is paying the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. If anyone can figure it out, send it our way!

Here is one place to start your research!

4 Responses to “Starving the beast! Another way to set policy at the Department of State”

  1. michellefromsandiego said

    follow $: foreign interests fund colleges that train diplomats
    http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/15699

    Like

  2. I think that the UN High Commissioner for Refugees office should reflect the people it serves. Instead of having that fancy building with the steel and glass, why not put them in a mud hut next to an open sewer in some third world scum hole? the US can spring for fly strips to hang from the ceilings, and we might even pitch in so they can rent a mongoose during cobra season. The UN can set a good example by showing how much they appreciate the cultures they want to unleash on the rest of us by wallowing in it.

    Like

  3. UNHCR has exactly ZERO accomplishments. It is a waste of our money.

    Like

  4. CLEAN THE ‘FREAKING’ SWAMP OF THE LEFTIES !

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: