Refugee Resettlement Watch

‘Government Slaves’ website gives list of 400 websites Google is attempting to chill, RRW is on it

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 1, 2017

Here is the news, hat tip: Judy

Government Slaves:

The war on truth has reached a fever pitch as Google has made it their mission to annihilate the independent media. The ‘New Media’ lead by the likes of Infowars, Breitbart, Natural News and many other great independent sites will have an uphill battle when it comes to getting their content in front of readers. Google has announced they will be doubling down on their ‘Orwellian’ practice of making stories disappear from their monopolistic search engine. Outlined in their Gestapo like 160-page handbook, Google describes exactly how they plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers.

Continue here, see the list and learn about other search engines to consider.

Screenshot of a portion of the list of 400. We are in good company:

Screenshot (798)

 

9 Responses to “‘Government Slaves’ website gives list of 400 websites Google is attempting to chill, RRW is on it”

  1. AnT said

    this is the huge Ann. life and liberty changing. war. First let me tell you I’m I love with all you are as an American and as the beautiful person you are. I’ve been quiet on your blog to comment, but no more. look for Farmer. I have a disqus as Farmer on breitbart, but I’ll sign to WordPress for you…hopefully I can get Farmer for a handle. if not I will write and say what I have. Thank you for a thousand years, and I pray your gift lasts that long and even longer. much much & all all the love you deserve or need, I have your back any day of the week. just ask. Mr. Tracy USA!!!

    >

    Like

  2. I have always had issues with social media for this very reason, that it gives them too much power to censor. I think that the obvious solution is to stick with established Internet channels in case SM tries to censor. A newsletter and instant messaging take the place of twitter, and a good old fashioned website, preferably hosted on your own server, is a good alternative to Facebook. Some people are even mirroring content to .onion sites in case of absolute censorship. How ironic we must resort to such measures as protection against the PC police who always claim to be on the side of free speech, democracy, and freedom.

    Like

  3. TakeBackOurRepublic said

    Thanks so much for this link!

    Like

  4. That’s a badge of honor!

    It’s way past time to impose common carrier status on Google, YouTube, Facebook, and other social media. Before someone says that they are private companies and can do whatever they want with their products: we don’t allow the telephone company to censor conversations it disagrees with, and the internet is no different.

    They are globalist corporations conforming to foreign law that conflicts with our own first Amendment. Before Obama gave away control of ICANN to the UN last year, there was a First Amendment limit on the actions of that US government-owned corporation. Now, ICANN has no such limitation and is de-listing websites it deems to be “hate speech.” Under the US Constitution, there is no such thing as “hate speech.” People have the God-given First Amendment right to express any idea or emotion, and that includes what globalists call “hate” (ironically, while they are all busy hating President Trump). On a related note, foreign-owned or controlled media should not be allowed to operate in the US market, period.

    There is an irreconcilable conflict of interest when a company is in the business of being a medium of transmission and also in the business of producing, providing, or policing content. Internet companies should not be allowed to operate in both markets.

    Like

  5. It’s 1984! I wouldn’t mind if I looked like I did in 1984. Seriously…this is a nightmare and something needs to be done about these monopolies that are nothing more than thought police.

    Like

  6. ruthred@verizon.net said

    Al Jazeera? Really? You need to take that one off!!!!

    Sent from AOL Mobile Mail

    Like

  7. misterpaul5a said

    Wouldn’t it be ‘loverly’ if you all got together to form a consortium of NEW-NEWS and build an opposition to the Google Monolith? As the saying goes, ‘follow the money’ – in fact this is a tremendous opportunity to prove just how effective ‘crowd-funding’ can really be. With the advent of the demise of the media giants – there must be hundreds of journalists scrambling to leave that sinking ship. Perhaps ‘Joe Public’ Is also getting fed-up with Google and the like? So much so that the time may well be ripe to starve the GOOMONOLITH of its life-blood? Perhaps one of the competitors of Google which ‘went to the wall’ can be brought back from the ‘dead’ resuscitated by a Consortium, backed by readers of your on-line news Group and dedicated ‘crowd-funding’? Stranger things have happened! The old adage of Shakespeare comes to mind AGAIN – “Ther is a tide in the affairs of men…….”. You can guarantee a hundred quid from THIS old codger in the U.K.!

    Like

  8. FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE, REDDIT, GOOGLE are PLACES OF PUBLIC GATHERING, “SOCIAL Media”, and ADVERTISE themselves as PUBLIC places.. They are also PUBLICLY TRADED CORPORATIONS, unlike the PRIVATELY owned and operated “Mom&Pop” Bakery and Party Planner SUED by homosexuals.
    FACEBOOK is a PUBLIC SPACE therefore it has no right or legal option to censor participants. FACEBOOK is a PUBLICLY TRADED company, NOT a “private entity” and it solicits PUBLIC memberships.
    Just as the “courts” say cake bakers HAVE to bake homosexual cakes, and wedding planners HAVE to “accept” homosexual weddings, ZUCKERberg has to accept opinions, videos, and pictures he does not like. These Social Media/Meeting Places must accept anything which is Permissible under the First Amendment.
    A lowly COUNTY CLERK was jailed for refusing to “do her duty” by not issuing homosexuals marriage licenses The Baker, Planner, and Clerk SHOULD have just said: “You homosexuals VIOLATE OUR COMMUNITY GUIDELINES” !!! They advertise themselves as “Social Media & Public Spaces” so everything that is covered under the First Amendment can be posted there. A Party Planner and a Baker were successfully sued for refusing service to homosexuals ….. these “Social Media” can & should also be sued for violating People’s 1st Amendment RIGHTS to speak freely in PUBLIC SPACES.
    Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc. engaging in politically motivated censorship is like your meter reader shutting off your electricity because you have a Trump sign on your lawn. These social media have become like public utilities and therefore have no right to engage in political censorship. It is way past time to impose common carrier status on social media. Just like the phone company cannot censor your conversations there, social media should not be allowed to interfere with content there. Social media is the modern day phone company.

    By the way, why is a clerk jailed for refusing to do her duty and register homosexual marriages,but these politicians and police are not jailed for allowing sanctuary cities and refusing to do THEIR duty? The same applies to ALL “social media”, YOUTUBE, and search engines.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: