UN: Israel to send its illegal aliens to Western countries (oops! cancel that)

This is what Israel has been contending with for years. Some of these migrant activists are already coming to the US!


It seems that Israeli Prime Minister nixed his own deal with the UN before the ink was dry on the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (aka HIAS)‘s crowing e-mail to its followers.

I received Mark Hetfield’s e-mail at 3:28 p.m. yesterday, but sometime later yesterday the New York Times reported that the deal was off.

I was planning to post on the Hetfield e-mail anyway this morning, but now the story gets even juicier.  My focus would have been on the outrageous idea that 16,000 Africans who broke in to Israel over the years would be resettled as refugees in WESTERN COUNTRIES. Which countries? The US!  Surely Europe can’t handle one more needy African!

***Update*** Canada in the cross hairs, see here.

(Readers need to know that we (the US) are already bringing rejected asylum seekers from Israel to be placed in Anytown, USA.  71 arrived between Oct. 1, 2017 and February, 28, 2018. Hundreds more have come in recent years probably all resettled by HIAS.)

Below is Mark Hetfield, CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society yesterday. We previously questioned why HIAS, one of nine major federal resettlement contractors, was mucking around in Israel’s business in the first place.


Screenshot (349)



Then here is the New York Times sometime after that e-mail went out.

By the way, after the original flood of illegal aliens entering Israel, the Israelis built a very successful wall.


JERUSALEM — In a head-spinning turnaround, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel announced on Monday that he had reached an extraordinary deal with the United Nations refugee agency to resettle thousands of African asylum seekers in Western countries. Within hours Mr. Netanyahu suspended the deal after coming under heavy criticism from his coalition partners.

The flip-flop appeared to reflect Mr. Netanyahu’s fear of losing support from those partners or from his right-wing constituency, who call the asylum seekers infiltrators and want them gone. His opponents on the left described the prime minister’s behavior as an embarrassing and cowardly surrender under pressure.

African protesters in Tel Aviv in 2014.   https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/10556609/African-refugees-plan-march-on-Jerusalem-amid-anger-at-Israeli-dentention-plans.html

Mr. Netanyahu, who is battling for his political future under the cloud of multiple corruption scandals and faces possible charges of bribery, had apparently failed to consult with most of his own conservative Likud Party colleagues or coalition allies before announcing the migrant deal.


The agreement with the United Nations was meant to replace a contentious Israeli plan that had offered the migrants a stark choice: forced deportation to Africa or prison. That plan fell through after Rwanda, the African country meant to receive the deportees, announced that it would accept only those who left Israel voluntarily.

In the afternoon, in a televised news conference, Mr. Netanyahu triumphantly announced the new deal, under which the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees committed to persuading countries in the West to take at least 16,250 migrants over five years, while Israel would grant official status as temporary residents to most who remained.

Estimates of the population of African asylum seekers in Israel, mostly from Eritrea and Sudan, range from 35,000 to 39,000.

But the agreement to let many stay in Israel drew harsh criticism from some of Mr. Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition allies, who were taken by surprise. Naftali Bennett, the education minister and leader of the far-right Jewish Home party, said the deal would “turn Israel into an infiltrator’s paradise.”

Mr. Netanyahu backtracked.


The plan was to be carried out in three phases, with the first 6,000 migrants expected to leave over the next 18 months.

William Spindler, a spokesman for the United Nations refugee agency in Geneva, said there was no agreement in place with other countries to take any of them. He said that the agency would need countries to come forward with offers, but that “we are confident we will be able to find places for these 16,000 people.”

More here.

The UN is confident! I’m not!  A major part of the deal requires WESTERN COUNTRIES to take 16,000 —- which countries?

And, why should Israel’s, or Malta’s, or Australia’s illegal aliens be our problem!

Refugees, asylum seekers, migrants are the problem of the country they have escaped to—-they are not the US’s problem—and if the President is serious about reforming the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program, simply disallowing resettlement from first world countries is something he can do at the State Department level!

See my category, ‘Israel and refugees’ with 169 previous posts archived here.

I’ll try to remember to put this at the end of every post….

Contact the President by clicking here.

5 thoughts on “UN: Israel to send its illegal aliens to Western countries (oops! cancel that)

  1. Many of these are European organizations. They advocate for Africans who have entered Israel without obtaining permission. https://hotline.org.il/en/refugees-and-asylum-seekers-en/
    Aviad Foundation
    The Blaustein Foundation
    Caritas France
    European Instrument for Democracy & Human Rights (EIDHR)
    Foundation for Population, Migration and Environment (BMU)
    International Bar Association Foundation
    The Kathryn Ames Foundation
    Moriah Fund
    The New Israel Fund
    Pro Asyl
    Rosa Luxemburg Foundation
    The Samuel Sebba Charitable Trust
    The Sigrid Rausing Trust
    Stiftung Do
    UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
    UN Voluntary Trust Fund on Contemporary Forms of Slavery
    UN Voluntary Trust Fund for Victims of Human Trafficking
    The Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund
    And numerous private donors


    1. That is, European and American organizations, which are outside of Israel, and funding the path of migrants.


  2. Two articles I read today mentioned Canada,Germany and Italy as the Western Countries to send to. Problem was, spokesman for two European countries said their countries had never agreed to any such deal. I doubt if even PM Trudeau would agree to this transfer if he was even informed of this “agreement”.


  3. I admire Israel for having the stones to get rid of this scum by any means possible. It is very sad and disappointing that our own people value our own country so little that they don’t even care if we are turned into a dump for third world garbage, but I guess that is what happens when you continuously fill your country full of foreigners and have a government dominated by morons who think that by handing these savages citizenship, that they magically become just like us, and will act accordingly. Israel wants to preserve it’s cultural and ethnic identity by not filling up the country with indifferent foreigners who contribute nothing and demand everything. We should care enough about our own nation to do likewise.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Reblogged this on islamnewworldorder and commented:
    Sorry, there is just plain too many people in the third World–they need to get a handle on their constant breeding and breeding and breeding! The truth is, when 100 people are taken out of the Third World, that gap is soon filled with 100 PLUS kids, and the 100 removed from the Third World are now freely living on welfare in their new home and freely breeding and breeding and breeding in order to outbreed their host-country and soon turn their new home into what they left.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.