Presidential determination for the number of refugees that COULD be admitted to the US in coming fiscal year “due Sept. 30”?

Actually, no, it is due weeks before the 30th of September as we told readers here in 2015!

Is Congress shirking its duty to America on refugee admissions? Yes, and has done so for more than 2 decades!

Although the President is tasked by law with setting the CAP (aka CEILING) for the number of refugees that could be admitted in the coming fiscal year, his administration is supposed to hold a consultation with Congress (House and Senate Judiciary Committees) after those committees have held hearings on the President’s proposed plan.

You might be saying, well yes, but if Congress holds hearings, the Open Borders Left will turn them in to a circus.  That could happen, but it is no reason for the Refugee Act of 1980 to be ignored as it has been for decades!  Either follow the law or dump it!

What got me thinking about this today is a news story from the National Catholic Reporter which says the plan is due on September 30th (new refugees would be arriving the next day!) and where we learn that Catholic lobbyists are on the Hill trying to get the attention of lawmakers so they might rain hell down on Trump.

Rumors are that Trump may set the refugee CAP for FY19 at 15,000-25,000 the lowest since the Ted Kennedy/Jimmy Carter law came in to being in 1980 and the contractors which include the US Conference of Catholic Bishops*** are steaming mad.

As usual, the report never mentions that the contractors are paid on a per refugee head basis, and so a huge drop in numbers means a lot less of your money will flow to the Bishops’ bank account.


Advocates prepare for possible cuts in refugee admissions to the US


Amid reports that this trend [low admission levels—ed] could continue, with a possible presidential determination of 15,000-25,000 for fiscal year 2019 when the decision is due Sept. 30, Catholic groups are combatting misinformation about refugees and advocating to members of Congress and administration officials in an effort to convince Trump to raise the cap.

Most Reverend Joe Vásquez, Bishop of Austin is chairman of the USCCB’s Migration and Refugee Services Office.

A refugee ceiling of 15,000 during an unprecedented refugee crisis “would be so low it’s laughable,” said Donald Kerwin, executive director of Center for Migration Studies of New York, an educational institute connected with the Scalabrini International Migration Network.

During past refugee crises, “the United States’ response was central to the global response and to resolving the situations of these massive levels of refugees and it’s not playing that role right now,” Kerwin added, calling reduced support for refugees “totally antithetical to our own history and our own values.”


Although the decision of how many refugees to admit is up to the president, the administration is required to consult with members of the House and Senate judiciary committees. Congress authorizes funding for the program.

Bill Canny, executive director of the U.S. bishops’ conference’s Migration and Refugee Services and Joan Rosenhauer, executive director of Jesuit Refugee Service/USA, both said their organizations have been engaging with Congress and administration officials in an effort to influence the decision.

The Justice for Immigrants webinar called on participants to visit or write their representatives in Congress, or sign a letter from Catholic leaders calling for a higher presidential determination.

More here.

I’m suggesting that 15,000-25,000 is too high. It should be ZERO until Congress undertakes to reform the whole US Refugee Admissions Program.


***These below are the nine federal refugee resettlement contractors.

You might be sick of seeing this list almost every day (it has been 4 whole days since I posted it!), but a friend once told me that people need to see something seven times before it completely sinks in, so it seems to me that 70, or even 700 isn’t too much!

And, besides I have new readers every day.

The present US Refugee Admissions Program will never be reformed if the system of paying the contractors by the head stays in place and the contractors are permitted to act as Leftwing political agitation groups, community organizers and lobbyists paid on our dime!

And, to add insult to injury they pretend it is all about ‘humanitarianism.’

The number in parenthesis is the percentage of their income paid by you (the taxpayer) to place the refugees into your towns and cities and get them signed up for their services (aka welfare)!  And, get them registered to vote eventually!

From my most recent accounting, here.  However, please see that Nayla Rush at the Center for Immigration Studies has done an update of their income!

7 thoughts on “Presidential determination for the number of refugees that COULD be admitted to the US in coming fiscal year “due Sept. 30”?

  1. Good day Ann

    Long time reader of your letters

    Just some small info

    A friend of mine from New Jersey sent me this e-mail

    They are pressing American Citizens, more and more for, supposed “real ID”, kinda like e-verify

    I live in Florida, Do you think this is gonna make any difference to the 50% of illegals working, on the construction

    site that, I am working at???. Should I start laughing now or later when, l have to get a facial recognition

    picture on my license.


    REAL ID To Begin In New Jersey: What To Know Here’s what to know about the REAL ID in New Jersey, including when it may start. The state has about a month to comply with federal law.


    Liked by 1 person

  2. You are right Ann, the number is too high. I think people need to start thinking about how we benefit by taking in these people versus what they cost us. It is very sad that the world has so many problems, but I don’t want my country turned into a refugee camp, and maybe if we make these people stay in their own countries and take responsibility for the mess, there won’t be so many problems. We have been trying to deal with the worlds constant issues by bailing people out and taking them in, and it hasn’t worked. Maybe its time to try a new approach.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I endorse accepting white S Africans that are being slaughtered by the sub human black people that should perish b/c they cannot grow food! There may be others that need humanitarian help but everyone MUST be vetted !

    I make custom I D Cards & free people!

    My Card is NOT offered to everyone – I vet everyone the best I can – yet it is on them to tell me the truth!

    On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:25 AM Refugee Resettlement Watch wrote:

    > Ann Corcoran posted: “Actually, no, it is due weeks before the 30th of > September as we told readers here in 2015! Is Congress shirking its duty to > America on refugee admissions? Yes, and has done so for more than > 2 decades! Although the President is tasked by law with setting ” >


  4. I dunno Ann. I think leaving the ceiling at 25,000 and giving SERIOUS preference to white South Africans would be a huge boon for our country. If Trump did something like that it would make peoples’ heads spin. And give me a reason to smile for a very long time.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. You should definitely keep posting the evil VOLAGs, Ann. Your friend is right, but the list is good reminder that all these groups and the thousands of people they work with are perennially, tirelessly working against our nation’s and our people’s interests. If I knew how to email-bomb many people at once I’d send an email scolding the lot of them. As it is I’m too cyber-unfriendly technically. But they all need a big ol’ spank…

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.